Just FYI, new blog post "Four New DNS Policy Scenarios for Windows Server 2016"
Just FYI, new blog post "Four New DNS Policy Scenarios for Windows Server 2016," at https://aka.ms/smhnq5
Thanks -
James McIllece
Just FYI, new blog post "Four New DNS Policy Scenarios for Windows Server 2016"
Just FYI, new blog post "Four New DNS Policy Scenarios for Windows Server 2016," at https://aka.ms/smhnq5
James McIllece
Just FYI, new blog post, "Deploy BranchCache Hosted Cache Mode with Windows Server 2016"
Just FYI, new blog post, "Deploy BranchCache Hosted Cache Mode with Windows Server 2016," at https://aka.ms/u2h8hx
James McIllece
Just FYI, new blog post, "Deploy BranchCache Hosted Cache Mode with Windows Server 2016"
Just FYI, new blog post, "Deploy BranchCache Hosted Cache Mode with Windows Server 2016," at https://aka.ms/u2h8hx
James McIllece
SNMP probe parameters not works
I Create SNMP probe monitor which monitoring HP procurve switch (up, down port)
In monitor i use
parameter: SnmpVarBinds/SnmpVarBind[OID=".1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.8.42"]/Value
operator: equals
value: 2
(1 - up, 2-down)
This monitor works fine.
__________________________________
Next i create specific monitor which monitor switch ports by:
The string which interprets this port is selected for an aggregator but not attached
In monitor i use
parameter: SnmpVarBinds/SnmpVarBind[OID=".1.3.6.1.4.1.25506.8.25.1.2.1.4"]/Value
operator: contain
value: appropriate
This monitor not work.
i don't know why?
1) May be problem in result of SNMP get. First working monitor get only one result with 1 or 2. Second not working monitor
get result for all 48 ports with big symbolic parameters?
2) May be problem in monitor parameter.
any advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated
Reply:
Hey, why do you create a SNMP probe in the first place?
Why just not discovering the device like any other network device:
How to Discover Network Devices in Operations Manager
When you this the HP ProCurve will be monitored as a Generic Device, it will not have the status of "Certified" which means you are able to do simple up/down monitoring.
But now comes the interesting part - you can do a small trick and "certify" your HP ProVurve and you will get port up/down information , VLANs and some other data. I have already posted how:
Monitoring CISCO 2960 Switches
You will just have to modify the discovery config file.
To make it even better you can get CPU and Memory information also (alsmost like on usual "certified" device) and Michel Kamp has blogged about this years ago. This involves basic authoring knowledge, but it is nothing fancy, everybody can do it (following the guide of course :) ):
Extending HP network devices with CPU and Memory counters
So at the end you will have monitored HP ProCurve with up and downs status, port up and down status, vlans, CPU, Memory, etc...
Just ask if you need more help.
Stoyan (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer" where applicable. This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognizes useful contributions. Thanks!)
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks for answer Stoyan Chalakov!
1) I Need to know how monitoring oid result with symbolic, not number parameters
2) I try to rediscover my device according you article.
Unfortunately it's Generic.
________________________
i add this to oid2type_Field.conf
# HP Procurve switch 1910-48
.1.3.6.1.4.1.25506.11.1.85 {
TYPE = Switch
VENDOR = HP
MODEL = HP Procurve switch 1910-48
CERTIFICATION = CERTIFIED
CONT = Generic-Bridge
VLAN = Dot1q
INSTRUMENTATION:
Interface-Fault = MIB2
Interface-Performance = MIB2
Port-Fault = MIB2
Port-Performance = MIB2
}
- Edited by SergIT Monday, October 3, 2016 1:27 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
after you modify the discovery config file you will have to rediscover your devices. Then they will appear as "certified" and you will get a bit more from them (port status, VLANs, etc, ect. )
HAve you tried re-running the discovery?
Another important topic: You have to modify the file on your servers, which are part of the resource pools, responsible for network monitoring. Usually the servers in it are dedicated only for this.
Regards,
Stoyan (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer" where applicable. This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognizes useful contributions. Thanks!)
------------------------------------
Reply:
It's work after reboot SCOM server. The icon of the divice in the left top corner not ok.
On the other discovered switch icon of the device ok!
2) What about "I Need to know how monitoring oid result with symbolic, not number parameters"
- Edited by SergIT Monday, October 3, 2016 1:26 PM
------------------------------------
SharePoint2013 term set values in SharePoint list column
Hello,
Here is requirement that I'm working on.
When I try to add an item to SharePoint list, I have 3 mandatory attributes that needs to be filled in.
- Country
- State
- City
Now, these country,state and city values are defined in the term store (managed metadata service application). So requirement is that when I add a new item to list.
- Country should be dropdown field and values should come from Term store.
- Based on the country selection, second dropdown should show all the states which again should be from term store
- Based on the state selection, third dropdown should show all the cities which again should be from term store.
We are trying to stay way from the complied code (event handler/receiver) so if it's possible with the CSOM then can some one please give me the example articles? OR suggest the better approach.
Thank you in advance.
Reply:
You could check out the brilliant https://spservices.codeplex.com/
I could not say if it covers exactly what you are looking for but it certainly shows you about to filter a field based on another field entry on a SharePoint form.
Alternatively I guess you could have a single field called "City" which the user picks and nest the term inside the country and city terms. I.e. the user picks Los Angeles of which the parent is California of which the parent is US.
------------------------------------
Round Trip Monitor mail flow - Exchange 2013 for External Mails
Hi All,<o:p></o:p>
We want to monitor the external mail flow with Round Trip, please share any internal or external tools or scripts available for that.<o:p></o:p>
- Edited by Test Mailflow on Roundtrip Saturday, October 1, 2016 7:09 AM
- Changed type Test Mailflow on Roundtrip Saturday, October 1, 2016 7:10 AM
Reply:
Hi
There is third party service provider to send you all mails send-receive round trips. http://mxalerts.com/
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi
You can monitor the mail flow by following PowerShells Test-Mailflow cmdlet to diagnose whether mail can be successfully sent from and delivered to the system mailbox on a Mailbox server:-
Test-Mailflow -AutoDiscoverTargetMailboxServer
Test-Mailflow -TargetEmailAddress
Test-Mailflow MailboxServerName01 -TargetMailboxServer MailboxServerName02
Test-Mailflow -TargetEmailAddress testuser@yourdomain.com
You also write Test-Mailflow results into the file by putting the output to ConvertTo-Html or ConvertTo-Csv and adding
Test-Mailflow -AutoDiscoverTargetMailboxServer | ConvertTo-Csv > "C:\MailFlowOutPut.csv"
There is also a script to do this job:-
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Test-the-Mailflow-based-on-52edd45b
http://exchangeserverpro.com/create-exchange-mail-flow-latency-heat-map-powershell/
Hope this will help you to check your mailfow
Kindly click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, this can be beneficial to other community members reading this thread.
Regards.
H.shakir
- Edited by H Shakir Saturday, October 1, 2016 8:28 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Updating sccm client fail
Hello ,
I have SCCM 2012 r2 sp1 and i am trying to update the client to R2 sp1 cu3 , It is fail error no : 1642
MCP MCSA MCSE MCT MCTS CCNA
Reply:
1642 = "The upgrade patch cannot be installed by the Windows Installer service because the program to be upgraded may be missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program. Verify that the program to be upgraded exists on your computer an d that you have the correct upgrade patch."
Are you install x86 to x64 machines?
Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.com
------------------------------------
Reply:
1642 = "The upgrade patch cannot be installed by the Windows Installer service because the program to be upgraded may be missing, or the upgrade patch may update a different version of the program. Verify that the program to be upgraded exists on your computer an d that you have the correct upgrade patch."
Are you install x86 to x64 machinesI am installing ?
Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.com
Hello Paul
Actually it is installed on 177 machines with successfully that is why i am confusing .
The second point is good , how can i calssified 32 bit and 64 bit by devices collection maybe it is solve the issue to create a device collection 64bit and push the 64 bit agent on it .
how can i create a device collection for 64 bit ?
MCP MCSA MCSE MCT MCTS CCNA
------------------------------------
Reply:
Cheers Paul | http://sccmentor.com
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thank you Paul
I will test ur solution and back to you .
MCP MCSA MCSE MCT MCTS CCNA
------------------------------------
Help with SIP truck networking on
Howdy, I need help with SIP truck networking. I already contacted for help from my ISP(this one is for a small business). The technician refereed me their KB page.
I need to configure Skype we are using it for our client meeting and other business meting . We always face issue with front end server is not starting. It always shows a message Starting.."
Please help me as this issue will affect our relationship with client. We are just having a small business with 50 employees.
Please help me if a easy fix is available.
Thanks in advance
- Moved by Barbara HenhaplMVP Saturday, October 1, 2016 5:32 AM Skype, not Project Server
Reply:
First thing, if you have installed the SFB FE and start the service the first time it could take some time to start teh frontend service.
You should look into the eventlog under application you will find Lync and all events for the SFB.
There you should find some more Infos about the starting problems.
Problems could be, cert issues, database issues etc. The SQL database services should be started.
If you want to use a SIP Trunk, be sure your proivider ist quallified for SFB.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/office/dn788947.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
regards Holger Technical Specialist UC
- Edited by Holger Bunkradt Saturday, October 1, 2016 6:19 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
- Edited by windowrunner Sunday, October 2, 2016 9:09 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
regards Holger Technical Specialist UC
------------------------------------
Learning PowerShell Online
Microsoft now expects us to have a working knowledge of PowerShell for all their admin certifications. They don't necessarily expect an extensive command of the shell, but at least a working knowledge.
PowerShell guru Don Jones puts it this way, "If you think certifications were a key to your getting and maintaining your job, then make no mistake: PowerShell is even more crucial. Ignore it at your peril."
But this prediction of his is just downright scary, "Learn PowerShell or learn to say, 'Would you like fries with that?'"
If you want to learn PowerShell, but prefer an online resource instead of a book, then I've found an excellent tutorial on the powershell.com website. It's called Mastering PowerShell by Dr. Tobias Weltner, and it's a training course divided into 20 short tutorials, starting with the basics.
I hope you find this resource useful on your way to PowerShell mastery.
- Edited by James JT Taylor Saturday, September 29, 2012 3:19 PM
Reply:
Julio Sanchez-Tirado http://scriptomato.com co-founder | CEO | Pitcher
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks for these resources.
There are also some courses available for free on the Microsoft Virtual Academy.
Bye.
Luigi Bruno
MCP, MCTS, MOS, MTA
- Edited by Luigi BrunoMVP Sunday, October 2, 2016 12:14 PM
------------------------------------
office 365 deployment
A client is using Gmail as mailing solution and then they deployed office 365 now then what can be issues they can face after having both mailing solution deployed.
Reply:
Hi Sonam,
To answer your question, i would like to clarify few points. Is this a mail migration or just a cutover? Is the client using both mail systems at same time? Is is the same SMTP domain used for both gmail and office 365? Is the MX has changed to Office 365?
------------------------------------
Pick Up the Phone
Why don't you pick up the phone?
I have not had a single call answered through this installation which has not been problem-free. You say that you have 24 hour service, but that doesn't seem to be the case. I don't care to "figure things out" myself with the installation of a new financial database, however that seems to be your plan for us.
When your employee eventually turns this terrible hold music off (which I have heard for over forty -five minutes with three calls in the last 48 hours) and asks what they can do for me, don't be surprised when she reports having to speak to an awful person. That is probably what I'll be and that is what your company has earned.
Thanks,
Ben
- Changed type Amy Wang_ Thursday, October 6, 2016 1:57 AM
Reply:
------------------------------------
Remove the Page option on Team Page
I'm probably being really dumb here but I'm setting up a Teamsite and have granted users edit permissions so they can use newsfeed which is where I want to start.
I can see at the top of the home page 2 options Browse and Page. If any user clicks on Page they can add text to the space above the Newsfeed, so effectively they can edit the appearance of the Team Site and could potentially put unwanted text there and there would be no way of knowing who has done it. Seems sort of stupid so how do I remove this?
If I remove permissions then they cannot add a newsfeed. I want them to be able to add a Newsfeed but not add test above as I have illustrated in my cap.
- Changed type RobertMallett Sunday, October 2, 2016 7:42 AM not specfic
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks for that - it's about as clear as custard - here's a little snippet:
Seem to be a pretty good solution and this is what the Newsfeed web part is actually being made more.
To make use of the newly created permission level navigation to the MicroFeed list permissions. Stop the inheritance of permissions, edit the Visitors group and assign the “Newsfeed participationâ€permission level.
Hmmmm Is this even English?
Also he does say " this is just for display the newsfeed for user that only have view permission." (sic). So it's not what I wanted. What I wanted was to allow the users to add new items to the newsfeed but not edit the page.
No beer, just a smile :-)
------------------------------------
September Cumulative Updates for Windows10 - KB3185611 for the original release, KB3185614 for 1511 (November Update), KB3189866 for 1607 (Anniversary Update)
And we're back yet again!
We saw fewer update install issues in August, which is great news. What are you seeing in September? Let me know.
Many thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
- Changed type Karen Hu Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:14 AM no question
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
------------------------------------
Reply:
I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
------------------------------------
Reply:
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
------------------------------------
Reply:
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
------------------------------------
Reply:
I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features
------------------------------------
Reply:
Windows Update now downloading KB3140743 (March Update).I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features
------------------------------------
Reply:
I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features Windows Update now downloading KB3140743 (March Update).
Windows Update trying to download/install old update is similar to what I reported last month (minor annoyance).
Tried "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" again after successful update to 10586.589 (takes about one hour, 25 minutes), again it failed and rolled back.
Will try third time with Nvidia Graphics Adapter disabled and will post results.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Windows update no longer presents "feature update Win 10 ver 1607", says I am up to date, tried "Windows 10 Upgrade 10 Assistant". It told me 10586 is not the latest build, click continue to install 14393, which fails and rolls back (with Nvidia disabled), might try again with Nvidia uninstalled.I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features Windows Update now downloading KB3140743 (March Update).
Windows Update trying to download/install old update is similar to what I reported last month (minor annoyance).
Tried "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" again after successful update to 10586.589 (takes about one hour, 25 minutes), again it failed and rolled back.
Will try third time with Nvidia Graphics Adapter disabled and will post results.
------------------------------------
Reply:
I am (was) at 1511 10586.545, ran Windows update, went into long install of "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" which failed and restored 1511 10586.545. Used Hide/Show app to hide "feature update Win 10 ver 1607". Hide/Show app shows lots of 1511 updates avail. Best way to proceed ?
That's odd. What 1511 updates are available? If you were on 10586.545 then you were on the latest update for the 1511 release. Thanks!
KB3185614 (cumulative update) Softpedia says it will update to OS Build 10586.589)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/what-s-new-in-windows-10-cumulative-updates-kb3189866-kb3185614-and-kb3185611-508261.shtml
There is also KB3161102, KB3181403 and 9 others (Office, etc.)
Should I try WinUpdate again with "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" hidden or work with you to try to debug "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" ?
10586.589 is today's update, I suggest seeing if that installs correctly (and feel free to take those other updates too). If you want to try 1607 again after that, we can try and figure out why it fails. Thanks!
Now up to date at 10586.589. What new features are available with 1607 ? I suspect the failure to install with roll back is Nvidia driver issue again. It will probably install if I disable the device. I am worried about loosing the only driver that works with win 10 (a not the latest modified by Microsoft). Might try 1607 at a later time.
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features Windows Update now downloading KB3140743 (March Update).
Windows Update trying to download/install old update is similar to what I reported last month (minor annoyance).
Tried "feature update Win 10 ver 1607" again after successful update to 10586.589 (takes about one hour, 25 minutes), again it failed and rolled back.
Will try third time with Nvidia Graphics Adapter disabled and will post results.
Windows update no longer presents "feature update Win 10 ver 1607", says I am up to date, tried "Windows 10 Upgrade 10 Assistant". It told me 10586 is not the latest build, click continue to install 14393, which fails and rolls back (with Nvidia disabled), might try again with Nvidia uninstalled.
Fourth attempt (to upgrade to 14393 via "Windows 10 Upgrade 10 Assistant" with Nvidia uninstalled) also failed and rolled back and major difficulties on rollback I guess due to uninstalled Nvidia (many BSOD with VMMI (VIRTUAL_MEMORY_MANAGEMENT_INTERNAL) crashes. Got it to stop by installing an old driver in safe mode and when examining old driver with Device Manager after restart in normal mode, MAGIC HAPPENED and I have a new driver with Microsoft mod (UGLY version 2.1 Build_223) but I'm still at 1511 10586.589, not 1607 or 14393. Also: My manual restore points have disappeared (deleted by upgrade attempt ?)
- Edited by Mighty Tiger Wednesday, September 14, 2016 5:35 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
What are you seeing in September? Let me know.
Many thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
John,
Any comment on the other posts in this forum regarding the CU stalling at "downloading 45%"? I had this on just 1 of 7 PC's and resolved it through the standard workaround of stopping services, deleting folders under SoftwareDistribution, re-starting services, and repeating update. Others are apparently finding quicker results by just installing from Update Catalog.
Thanks...
------------------------------------
Reply:
What are you seeing in September? Let me know.
Many thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
John,
Any comment on the other posts in this forum regarding the CU stalling at "downloading 45%"? I had this on just 1 of 7 PC's and resolved it through the standard workaround of stopping services, deleting folders under SoftwareDistribution, re-starting services, and repeating update. Others are apparently finding quicker results by just installing from Update Catalog.
Thanks...
I heard a number of cases of this overnight, I'm checking into it this morning. Might need some logs from you, is that okay? Thanks!
------------------------------------
Reply:
I heard a number of cases of this overnight, I'm checking into it this morning. Might need some logs from you, is that okay? Thanks!
Yes on sending logs but I have infrequent access to the one PC so may take some time.
Some other observations that might help: update was successful first time on both 32-bit and 64-bit installs but the one that failed was a 64-bit. It was also the only one that is still an upgrade from Win7 to Win10 (7 to 1511 to 1607). All others had been upgraded but then subsequently clean installed. Also, prior to my workaround on the one, I tried rebooting to see if it would complete but instead it found an update for Silverlight (KB3182373) that was not listed with the first set and installed it before showing the CU again stuck at 45%. Almost had the feeling that the Silverlight download was somehow interrupting the initial download (probably just coincidental). None of the other six PC's had Silverlight installed since they were clean installs. I have now removed Silverlight from the problem PC since I don't really need it.
------------------------------------
Reply:
I heard a number of cases of this overnight, I'm checking into it this morning. Might need some logs from you, is that okay? Thanks!Yes on sending logs but I have infrequent access to the one PC so may take some time.
Some other observations that might help: update was successful first time on both 32-bit and 64-bit installs but the one that failed was a 64-bit. It was also the only one that is still an upgrade from Win7 to Win10 (7 to 1511 to 1607). All others had been upgraded but then subsequently clean installed. Also, prior to my workaround on the one, I tried rebooting to see if it would complete but instead it found an update for Silverlight (KB3182373) that was not listed with the first set and installed it before showing the CU again stuck at 45%. Almost had the feeling that the Silverlight download was somehow interrupting the initial download (probably just coincidental). None of the other six PC's had Silverlight installed since they were clean installs. I have now removed Silverlight from the problem PC since I don't really need it.
Thanks for the additional info, this could help. :-)
When you get a sec, please download the copylogs tool from my OneDrive, run it from an Administrator command prompt, and then upload the logs to the TechNet folder on the same OneDrive. Many thanks in advance!
OneDrive is here: https://1drv.ms/f/s!AtwXjrnjoGBml2txQtByBKq8_Yrj
------------------------------------
Reply:
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features
That page looks atrocious (and is mostly dysfunctional) in IE. Much better looking and performing in Edge.
Apparently I am still using the August update for 1607.
Ah. It's the Microsoft Compatibility List! Unchecking that makes it look and act much better--similar to Edge. <LOL/>
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
Here you go! :-) https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/features
That page looks atrocious (and is mostly dysfunctional) in IE. Much better looking and performing in Edge.
Apparently I am still using the August update for 1607.
Ah. It's the Microsoft Compatibility List! Unchecking that makes it look and act much better--similar to Edge. <LOL/>
Robert Aldwinckle
---
No comment. :-)
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
as my update is also hanging at 48% on KB3189866, I uploaded my logs, too.
Great, thanks!
------------------------------------
Reply:
KB3185614 failed at 95% (or maybe it was 98%?) and rolled back. Running Win 10 Pro 1511 10586.545 on an ACPI x64 PC w/ Intel HG Graphics 3000. Win 10 Pro was installed as an upgrade from Win 7 Pro.
Seems a replay of the failed KB3140745 Cumulative Update failure experienced back in March 2016. In that episode, after multiple roll-backs at 98%, I hid the culprits. Two months later in May 2016, cumulative update KB3163018 successfully installed. No issues since until today.
I uploaded the logs for you: (WULogs-Eileen-OLEANDER-BLUE-20160915-065704.zip)
------------------------------------
Reply:
my update is also hanging at 48% on KB3189866 W-10 version 1607. Have rolled back image several times with same results.
Also note this on Dell computer which came with W-10 a year ago.- Edited by Ensign986 Thursday, September 15, 2016 5:17 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
KB3185614 failed at 95% (or maybe it was 98%?) and rolled back. Running Win 10 Pro 1511 10586.545 on an ACPI x64 PC w/ Intel HG Graphics 3000. Win 10 Pro was installed as an upgrade from Win 7 Pro.
Seems a replay of the failed KB3140745 Cumulative Update failure experienced back in March 2016. In that episode, after multiple roll-backs at 98%, I hid the culprits. Two months later in May 2016, cumulative update KB3163018 successfully installed. No issues since until today.
I uploaded the logs for you: (WULogs-Eileen-OLEANDER-BLUE-20160915-065704.zip)
Hi Eileen,
This one looked a little odd, but I think the following steps should sort you out. Can you give it a try and let me know?
Open an Administrator command prompt
- Net stop bits
- Net stop wuauserv
- Net stop appidsvc
- Net stop cryptsvc
- Del "%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Application Data\Microsoft\Network\Downloader\qmgr*.dat" (quotes and all!)
- Del c:\windows\SoftwareDistribution\*.* /s
- Net start bits
- Net start wuauserv
- Net start appidsvc
- Net start cryptsvc
- Check for Updates and see if it works.
Thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
------------------------------------
Reply:
my update is also hanging at 48% on KB3189866 W-10 version 1607. Have rolled back image several times with same results.
Also note this on Dell computer which came with W-10 a year ago.
Is the installation hanging, or the download? Thanks!
------------------------------------
Reply:
as my update is also hanging at 48% on KB3189866, I uploaded my logs, too.
We think we tracked down the source of this problem yesterday, but it takes some time for our corrective measure to replicate out to all the Windows Update cache servers. Should sort itself out before too long though.
Thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
I do see a permanently failing download of kb3189866 on WSUS... its simply said impossible to distribute that patch with WSUS.
here the WSUS server eventlog entry:
Task Category: 2Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer:
Description:
Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /d/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3189866-x64_d33b0b945db5ce1ea6414ffcb3e2afbad25fbe74.psf
Destination File: c:\WSUS\WsusContent\74\D33B0B945DB5CE1EA6414FFCB3E2AFBAD25FBE74.psf
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Windows Server Update Services" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">364</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>2</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2016-09-15T11:28:53.000000000Z" />
<EventRecordID>11095</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer></Computer>
<Security />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /d/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3189866-x64_d33b0b945db5ce1ea6414ffcb3e2afbad25fbe74.psf
Destination File: c:\WSUS\WsusContent\74\D33B0B945DB5CE1EA6414FFCB3E2AFBAD25FBE74.psf</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
------------------------------------
Reply:
Cannot download 3185611 to WSUS. CRC verification failure. One interesting thing is that when I manually download the psf file, the digital signature is invalid.
Log:
2016-09-16 00:43:49.784 UTC Info WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.ProcessBITSNotificationQueue ContentSyncAgent recieved Transferred Event for Item: c52c8f86-88a5-4721-ae32-0a9c6b330635
2016-09-16 00:43:49.785 UTC Info WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.ContentSyncSPFireStateMachineEvent ContentSyncAgent firing Event: FileDownloaded for Item: c52c8f86-88a5-4721-ae32-0a9c6b330635
2016-09-16 00:43:49.848 UTC Info WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.VerifyCRC filelocalpath is E:\WSUS_Cache\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf, additionalHash is A473AD0640B6A7ABB18B6C76C5CE4F22F72FE7C5D4D09351111ABC2A49D9C96A
2016-09-16 00:44:21.342 UTC Info WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.VerifyCRC calculated sha1 hash is 31EB3B28F2DC12C8FB131C346D7FCAC4803E175A
2016-09-16 00:44:21.498 UTC Warning WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.ProcessBITSNotificationQueue Invalid file deleted: E:\WSUS_Cache\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf
2016-09-16 00:44:21.499 UTC Info WsusService.30 ContentSyncAgent.ContentSyncSPFireStateMachineEvent ContentSyncAgent firing Event: FileVerificationFailed for Item: c52c8f86-88a5-4721-ae32-0a9c6b330635
2016-09-16 00:44:34.129 UTC Info WsusService.30 EventLogEventReporter.ReportEvent EventId=364,Type=Error,Category=Synchronization,Message=Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /c/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3185611-x64_d4a088ac78c72872cc32d4fe953e8cfc324b6af1.psf
Destination File: E:\WSUS_Cache\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Step #5: Path not found. Proceeded to delete SoftwareDistribution files anyway. Update rolled back at 99%.
Me too. Dell XPS 15 Win10 x64. KB3185614 fails at 99% and is rolled back. In contrast to evollo I did not tried the Steps you suggested.
I tried disabling the UEFI Secure Boot feature and deleting old Entries of registries ProfileList, but no success.
Always get error code 0x800F0922 in event log (german text: Installationsfehler: Die Installation des folgenden Updates ist mit Fehler 0x800F0922 fehlgeschlagen: Kumulatives Update für Windows 10 Version 1511 für x64-basierte Systeme (KB3185614))
- Edited by Luke15153 Friday, September 16, 2016 7:14 AM added error code
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
What are you seeing in September?
Better experience with workarounds. <eg>
A success reported today:
Meanwhile I am still uncertain how brittle I should be regarding the update procedure. E.g. yesterday, I updated my mother's W10 X64 Home. Coincidentally her MBAM happened to be completely uninstalled because I had done that while trying to solve a problem involving her HP Support tool. It was the smoothest cumulative update so far. Usually I always at least disable MBAM from starting with Windows and turn off its real-time monitor.
And today, I have to decide whether I should uninstall Hyper-V before allowing the latest cumulative update. Probably now would be the time to do it to minimize all possible interactions with Hyper-V and the update because it is currently showing as "ready to download". Also, IE seems to be in a very strange state, especially on Answers, so a reboot for both seems like a good idea before getting and installing the update. TBD.
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
This update excelled itself. First time I tried it I ended up with a completely unbootable computer which could only tell me "An operating system wasn't found" when it started.
After some repair work and then a long period while it backed out the update it was back to normal again. I've since tried the installation twice, the same problem didn't recur but neither did the update install. The last time it took 55 minutes to get to 98% then failed and spent what must have been a similar amount of time rolling back the update.
The Event Viewer reports "Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x800F0922: Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1511 for x64-based Systems (KB3185614)."
I'm on 1511 10586.164 by the way.
------------------------------------
Reply:
error 0x800F0922
This is one of the "this should never happen" codes that finally got its own code but has not been clearly documented. You can find out what it supposedly means by finding it in your CBS.log (or relevant archived portion).
Here's an example
You could try using the timestamp in the Event log entry as context which should bound your search in the CBS.log. E.g. probably the error occurred before it was reported.
HTH
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
kb3189866 is now downloaded by WSUS ... but now KB3185611 fails with CRC error:
Log Name: ApplicationSource: Windows Server Update Services
Date: 9/16/2016 8:57:07 PM
Event ID: 364
Task Category: 2
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Description:
Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /c/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3185611-x64_d4a088ac78c72872cc32d4fe953e8cfc324b6af1.psf
Destination File: c:\WSUS\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf
------------------------------------
Reply:
Edit: solved problem. My bad! It appears App Readiness service was disabled, which caused Edge updates to fail. After enabling App Readiness KB3185611 installed flawlessly.
---------------------------
KB3185611 for Windows 10 x64 fails to install no matter if it started from Update Manager or as standalone downloaded windows10.0-kb3185611-x64_be480763644c5b51f63b299b89e0281e1a32aba1.msu package. Always reaches 100% and always rolls back with error code 0x800f0922.
CBS log explains this code as [HRESULT = 0x800f0922 - CBS_E_INSTALLERS_FAILED].
Tracking the same log for reason which caused rollback, i.e. searching for string "Failure will not be ignored: A rollback will be initiated" leads to following sections:
---SECTION 1---
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CSI 00000069 Begin executing advanced installer phase 24 (0x00000018) index 199 (0x00000000000000c7) (sequence 224)
Old component: [ml:336{168},l:334{167}]"Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Culture=neutral, Version=10.0.10240.16384, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, ProcessorArchitecture=amd64, versionScope=NonSxS"
New component: [ml:336{168},l:334{167}]"Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Culture=neutral, Version=10.0.10240.17113, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, ProcessorArchitecture=amd64, versionScope=NonSxS"
Install mode: uninstall
Smart installer: FALSE
Installer ID: {f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf}
Installer name: [36]"AppX Registration Advanced Installer"
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CSI 0000006a Performing 1 operations as follows:
(0) LockComponentPath: flags: 0 comp: {l:16 b:f822269af311d201ac00000044045004} pathid: {l:16 b:f822269af311d201ad00000044045004} path: [l:242{121}]"\SystemRoot\WinSxS\amd64_microsoft-windows-m..osoftedge.appxsetup_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.10240.16384_none_ab4b13347435e765" pid: 444 starttime: 131187076513411279 (0x01d211f376b430cf)
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CSI 0000006b Performing 1 operations as follows:
(0) LockComponentPath: flags: 0 comp: {l:16 b:4c85289af311d201ae00000044045004} pathid: {l:16 b:4c85289af311d201af00000044045004} path: [l:242{121}]"\SystemRoot\WinSxS\amd64_microsoft-windows-m..osoftedge.appxsetup_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.10240.17113_none_ab3ee046743f201a" pid: 444 starttime: 131187076513411279 (0x01d211f376b430cf)
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CSI 0000006c@2016/9/18:21:28:30.839 Package Full Name found from manifest: [70]"Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_20.10240.16384.0_neutral_neutral_8wekyb3d8bbwe"
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CSI 0000006d@2016/9/18:21:28:30.839 Enumerating Key [ml:256{128},l:254{127}]"\Registry\Machine\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Appx\AppxAllUserStore\S-1-5-21-2072796489-2219481737-1248562613-500".
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Error CSI 0000006e@2016/9/18:21:28:30.855 (F) base\appmodel\inboxappinstallerai\appxreg.cpp(157): Error HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(1058) originated in function Windows::WCP::AppXRegistration::BasicInstaller::Uninstall expression: RDSAppXOnlineNotifyPackageChanges(APPCHANGETYPE_INBOX)
[gle=0x80004005]
2016-09-19 00:28:30, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918203728.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918164438.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918153145.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918014104.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160917172641.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Could not get active session for current session file logging [HRESULT = 0x80004003 - E_POINTER]
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Not able to add pending.xml.bad to Windows Error Report. [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Startup: Changing logon timeout to a static timeout: 10800000
2016-09-19 00:28:31, Info CBS Progress: UI message updated. Operation type: Update. Stage: 1 out of 1. Percent progress: 36.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CSI 0000006f Performing 1 operations as follows:
(0) LockComponentPath: flags: 0 comp: {l:16 b:988ff59af311d201b000000044045004} pathid: {l:16 b:988ff59af311d201b100000044045004} path: [l:238{119}]"\SystemRoot\WinSxS\x86_microsoft.windows.s..ation.badcomponents_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.10240.16384_none_e4739596a56e9b02" pid: 444 starttime: 131187076513411279 (0x01d211f376b430cf)
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Error [0x018051] CSI 00000070 (F) Failed execution of queue item Installer: AppX Registration Advanced Installer ({f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf}) with HRESULT HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(1058). Failure will not be ignored: A rollback will be initiated after all the operations in the installer queue are completed; installer is reliable[gle=0x80004005]
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918203728.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918164438.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918153145.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918014104.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160917172641.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Could not get active session for current session file logging [HRESULT = 0x80004003 - E_POINTER]
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CBS Not able to add pending.xml.bad to Windows Error Report. [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CSI 00000071 Creating NT transaction (seq 2), objectname [6]"(null)"
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CSI 00000072 Created NT transaction (seq 2) result 0x00000000, handle @0x484
2016-09-19 00:28:32, Info CSI 00000073@2016/9/18:21:28:32.870 Beginning NT transaction commit...
2016-09-19 00:28:33, Info CSI 00000074@2016/9/18:21:28:33.026 CSI perf trace:
CSIPERF:TXCOMMIT;152830
2016-09-19 00:28:33, Info CSI 00000075@2016/9/18:21:28:33.026 CSI Advanced installer perf trace:
CSIPERF:AIDONE;{f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf};Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Version = 10.0.10240.17113, pA = amd64, nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35};2258376us
2016-09-19 00:28:33, Info CSI 00000076 End executing advanced installer (sequence 224)
Completion status: HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_ADVANCED_INSTALLER_FAILED)
---SECTION 2---
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CSI 000004eb Begin executing advanced installer phase 38 (0x00000026) index 295 (0x0000000000000127) (sequence 334)
Old component: [ml:336{168},l:334{167}]"Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Culture=neutral, Version=10.0.10240.16384, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, ProcessorArchitecture=amd64, versionScope=NonSxS"
New component: [ml:336{168},l:334{167}]"Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Culture=neutral, Version=10.0.10240.17113, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35, ProcessorArchitecture=amd64, versionScope=NonSxS"
Install mode: install
Smart installer: FALSE
Installer ID: {f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf}
Installer name: [36]"AppX Registration Advanced Installer"
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CSI 000004ec Performing 1 operations as follows:
(0) LockComponentPath: flags: 0 comp: {l:16 b:1619abb0f311d2017d02000044045004} pathid: {l:16 b:1619abb0f311d2017e02000044045004} path: [l:242{121}]"\SystemRoot\WinSxS\amd64_microsoft-windows-m..osoftedge.appxsetup_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.10240.16384_none_ab4b13347435e765" pid: 444 starttime: 131187076513411279 (0x01d211f376b430cf)
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CSI 000004ed Performing 1 operations as follows:
(0) LockComponentPath: flags: 0 comp: {l:16 b:1619abb0f311d2017f02000044045004} pathid: {l:16 b:1619abb0f311d2018002000044045004} path: [l:242{121}]"\SystemRoot\WinSxS\amd64_microsoft-windows-m..osoftedge.appxsetup_31bf3856ad364e35_10.0.10240.17113_none_ab3ee046743f201a" pid: 444 starttime: 131187076513411279 (0x01d211f376b430cf)
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CSI 000004ee@2016/9/18:21:29:08.605 Enumerating Key [ml:256{128},l:254{127}]"\Registry\Machine\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Appx\AppxAllUserStore\S-1-5-21-2072796489-2219481737-1248562613-500".
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CSI 000004ef@2016/9/18:21:29:08.605 Enumerating Key [ml:276{138},l:274{137}]"\Registry\Machine\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Appx\AppxAllUserStore\EndOfLife\S-1-5-21-2072796489-2219481737-1248562613-500".
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Error CSI 000004f0@2016/9/18:21:29:08.605 (F) base\appmodel\inboxappinstallerai\appxreg.cpp(87): Error HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(1058) originated in function Windows::WCP::AppXRegistration::BasicInstaller::Install expression: RDSAppXOnlineNotifyPackageChanges(APPCHANGETYPE_INBOX)
[gle=0x80004005]
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CBS.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918203728.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918164438.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918153145.log to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160918014104.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Added C:\Windows\Logs\CBS\CbsPersist_20160917172641.cab to WER report.
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Could not get active session for current session file logging [HRESULT = 0x80004003 - E_POINTER]
2016-09-19 00:29:08, Info CBS Not able to add pending.xml.bad to Windows Error Report. [HRESULT = 0x80070002 - ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND]
2016-09-19 00:29:09, Error [0x018051] CSI 000004f1 (F) Failed execution of queue item Installer: AppX Registration Advanced Installer ({f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf}) with HRESULT HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(1058). Failure will not be ignored: A rollback will be initiated after all the operations in the installer queue are completed; installer is reliable[gle=0x80004005]
2016-09-19 00:29:09, Info CSI 000004f2@2016/9/18:21:29:09.261 CSI Advanced installer perf trace:
CSIPERF:AIDONE;{f1aab1ba-6ee0-4d94-baeb-c9fd61f365cf};Microsoft-Windows-MicrosoftEdge.appxsetup, Version = 10.0.10240.17113, pA = amd64, nonSxS, PublicKeyToken = {l:8 b:31bf3856ad364e35};679693us
2016-09-19 00:29:09, Info CSI 000004f3 End executing advanced installer (sequence 334)
Completion status: HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_ADVANCED_INSTALLER_FAILED)
I miss the times when updates for each application and component were being released separately.
- Edited by Reror Erporter Monday, September 19, 2016 2:00 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
kb3189866 is now downloaded by WSUS ... but now KB3185611 fails with CRC error:
Log Name: Application
Source: Windows Server Update Services
Date: 9/16/2016 8:57:07 PM
Event ID: 364
Task Category: 2
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Description:
Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /c/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3185611-x64_d4a088ac78c72872cc32d4fe953e8cfc324b6af1.psf
Destination File: c:\WSUS\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf
We're working on getting that fixed, sorry about that. :-(
(And sorry for the delay, was away from the office for a few days for a family event.)
John Wink [MSFT]
------------------------------------
Reply:
This update excelled itself. First time I tried it I ended up with a completely unbootable computer which could only tell me "An operating system wasn't found" when it started.
After some repair work and then a long period while it backed out the update it was back to normal again. I've since tried the installation twice, the same problem didn't recur but neither did the update install. The last time it took 55 minutes to get to 98% then failed and spent what must have been a similar amount of time rolling back the update.
The Event Viewer reports "Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0x800F0922: Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1511 for x64-based Systems (KB3185614)."
I'm on 1511 10586.164 by the way.
What Robert said. :-)
Elsewhere in the CBS log you should be able to pinpoint *which* installer actually failed, and I'd love to know so we can look into it.
Thanks!
John Wink [MSFT]
------------------------------------
Reply:
kb3189866 is now downloaded by WSUS ... but now KB3185611 fails with CRC error:
Log Name: Application
Source: Windows Server Update Services
Date: 9/16/2016 8:57:07 PM
Event ID: 364
Task Category: 2
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Description:
Content file download failed.
Reason: CRC verification failure.
Source File: /c/msdownload/update/software/secu/2016/09/windows10.0-kb3185611-x64_d4a088ac78c72872cc32d4fe953e8cfc324b6af1.psf
Destination File: c:\WSUS\WsusContent\F1\D4A088AC78C72872CC32D4FE953E8CFC324B6AF1.psf
We're working on getting that fixed, sorry about that. :-(
(And sorry for the delay, was away from the office for a few days for a family event.)
John Wink [MSFT]
We've reissued the Windows 10 RTM and Windows 10 Anniversary Update packages as KB3193821 and KB3193494 respectively; This is intended to resolve the various download issues. Please let us know if it works for you (or not!). Thanks!
John Wink [ MSFT]
------------------------------------
Reply:
- Edited by Mighty Tiger Monday, September 26, 2016 4:28 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Concerning my installation issues:
I checked the cbs.log and found three files missing in system32 folder. I reinstalled win 10 and since then everything runs fine. The cumulative update has installed without any problems.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Is that "spinning dots" thing (e.g. the one caused by a broken profile) being handled yet? If so, there may be a regression or something related was missed by the fix for it
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
Follow-up to my Win 10 Pro update issues. Never succeeded with the KB3185614 update. Solution was a direct download and install of the Win 10 Anniversary Update. While this update to 1607 completed, I was left with a dead Print Spooler. This was not the first time the Print Spooler crashed after a major Win 10 update. The first time was when the machine was upgraded from Win 7 Pro to Win 10 Pro; the second time was after a subsequent Win 10 cumulative update (which interestingly also repeatedly rolled back at 99% and never completed); this was the third occurrence. Each time this occurs, I have to fix the registry to get the spooler going again. (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Spooler>DependOnService>[Delete the string value "http"]. Makes me wonder whether the Print Spooler error may be related to this 99% roll-back issue.
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
KB3189866 for 1607 (Anniversary Update)
?
On two 1607 machines I just saw KB3194496 which supposedly replaces 3192366 (?) and gave build 14393.222 (according to winver.exe). However, according to Update History it is KB3189866 which is being superseded.
In any case, both installations happened in one pass. In one case I was prepared and had disabled MBAM (on my mother's W10 Home). On the second I had an incredibly bad UX before the Update Restart reboot. Maybe the good news is that I didn't have to do anything with Hyper-V. I didn't resort to doing a hard reset but it sure looked like I might have to. I couldn't see anything but a presentation that I had been watching continued to be heard; I had to sign in using Narrator; my pen was not matching anything which was on the screen; etc. My keyboard arrow keys were backwards (normally my Tablet is in Portrait orientation and I think something made it think that it was in Landscape). Eventually I got Task Manager up on my big monitor (which is always Landscape but at first had been disconnected) and killed everything I could including explorer.exe then started shutdown.exe -r. That's when I was "informed" that I was doing an Update. I should have known. ; ]
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
How to open Windows 10's new UWP File Explorer Build 14936
Full credit to Avirup Ghosh who posted this on YouTube.
was unable to open this FileExplorer.exe from "C:\Windows\SystemApps\Microsoft.Windows.FileExplorer_cw5n1h2txyewy".
So just follow the steps
step 1
Open to Settings
Go to Update & Security
Then enable Developer Mode in "For Developers" tab
Step 2
Turn on "Turn on remote diagnostics over local area network connections."
Turn on "Authentication"
Step 3
Set your "User Name" and "Password"
Step 3 Copy the link that provided in "Connection using" to your browser
Step 4 Enter your User Name and Password
Step 5 (Final) Go to Installed App panel Search for FileExplorer in the drop-down menu Just click Start
The YouTube video which shows it and is nicely done. How to open Windows 10's new UWP File Explorer
- Edited by -Mr Happy- Saturday, October 1, 2016 1:56 PM Correction in title
Update Taking Forever. Computer unusable.
Laptop has been going through the September Windows 10 update for 18 hours now and this is the second time Windows has tried to do this. 1st time I let it go for 22 hours, then forced a power-down. It then just started the update again. This is will be my last Windows machine. Does this take more than a day in some cases or is this a lost cause? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
-Andy LeDuc
Reply:
Ugh, sorry to hear of your issue. If the power off during the upgrade did not help (i.e. roll back the old Windows or get the new Windows) then more drastic action maybe needed. So before that leave it another 12 hours perhaps (sleep on it?). Seem some Windows process need 24 hours (unrelated to this but left some Windows tasks along time myself).
Beyond that well, accessing your drive (as a removed drive and external drive in another USB drive etc on another system) to backup all your data, docs photos videos etc. Favourites, basically everything backup and do a clean install of Windows on the device, install apps and restore all backed up data again. To make the machine usable again if it has gone that wrong.
You said any suggestions :)
- Edited by -Mr Happy- Friday, September 30, 2016 10:19 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
You can download and install the standalone update from the following site:
https://catalog.update.microsoft.com/v7/site/Home.aspx
S.Sengupta, Windows Insider MVP
------------------------------------
Windows 10
I have had to restore my system and it is now running windows 7. I had downloaded windows 10 (free download), but the restore got rid of it.
Can I re-download and install windows 10 for free?
Thanks for your help.
Connie Boyle
Reply:
I have had to restore my system and it is now running windows 7. I had downloaded windows 10 (free download), but the restore got rid of it.
Can I re-download and install windows 10 for free?
Thanks for your help.
Connie Boyle
Yes. If your Windows 10 was activated before you restored back to Win 7.
The moment Win 10 is activated, it acquires the Digital License.
Digital License allows you to reinstall the SAME Win 10 Edition into the SAME computer anytime you want and as often as you want. There is no time limit restriction.
No product key is required and activation will be automatic.
Just one thing to remind you...........
When you reinstall Windows 10, you must use the iso file which has the same Win 10 edition , Language and Bit version as the one you were using.
When you reinstall Win 10, you might be asked for product key. Just select the SKIP option or the "I don't have a product key" option, and continue.
When installation is completed, activation will be automatic.
Use this MCT link to download your Win 10 iso file.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/software-download/windows10
- Edited by david hk129 Monday, October 3, 2016 4:48 AM
------------------------------------
Launch eventvwr.msc connect to computer different credentials
Hi,
in order to implement Microsoft LAPS we´re testing our scripts for help desk. One of them is simply open eventvwr and connect to a remote pc (eventvwr.msc remotepc). I´ve tried different ways to open eventvwr.msc connecting to a remote pc and using diffrent credentials for the connection. Scripts are going to run from a terminalserver and access to the clients is only allowed throw a local admin account (LAPS).
$adminuser= "$computername\user" $localpw= "xxx" $secpasswd = ConvertTo-SecureString $localpw -AsPlainText -Force $mycreds = New-Object System.Management.Automation.PSCredential ($adminuser, $localpw) New-PSDrive -Name $computername -PSProvider FileSystem -Root "\\$computername\c$" -Credential $mycreds Start-Process -FilePath "C:\Windows\System32\eventvwr.exe" -ArgumentList $computername
this unfortunately dont work (idea came by http://www.visualbasicscript.com/Event-Viewer-Alternate-Account-Credentials-m38327.aspx). I know I could do easyly do "Invoke-Command", but we need the viewer (gui) too.
Thanks all for the kind assistance!
- Changed type Bill_Stewart Monday, October 31, 2016 6:53 PM
- Moved by Bill_Stewart Monday, October 31, 2016 6:53 PM Question reveals fundamental gaps in understanding; abandoned
Reply:
what you are trying to do cannot be done.
You can open MMC and make a custom console that is permanently connected to a different system then launch that from PowerShell.
The eventvwr has no automation interfaces.
You start-process is attempting to run the viewer on the remote computer. You cannot run a GUI app remotely.
\_(ツ)_/
------------------------------------
Reply:
-- Bill Stewart [Bill_Stewart]
------------------------------------
Background job returns different results from PSJob
Get-WmiObjectWin32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration-Filter{IPEnabled='TRUE'} -ComputerName$Server-AsJob| Out-Null
$NICSettings=Get-Job| Wait-Job-Timeout60 | Receive-Job-ErrorActionSilentlyContinue
is returning me different results from
Start-job -argumentlist $server -scriptblock {
param (
$server
)
Get-WmiObjectWin32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration-Filter{IPEnabled='TRUE'} -ComputerName$Server
} | Out-null
$NICSettings=Get-Job| Wait-Job-Timeout60 | Receive-Job-ErrorActionSilentlyContinue
The reason I am trying to run it as a background job rather than a PSJob is because occasionally the PSJob throws an error saying it has been disposed already when I try to receive the results. I'm eventually using the SetDNSServerSearachOrder method on the returned object and the background job is returning an object without the method where the PSJob returns an object with the method.
Thanks,
Chris Hirst
- Edited by ChrisSHirst Friday, September 30, 2016 12:28 PM
- Changed type Bill_Stewart Monday, November 21, 2016 7:04 PM
Reply:
Start-job -argumentlist $server -scriptblock { Get-WmiObject Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration -Filter 'IPEnabled=True' -ComputerName $args[0] } | Wait-Job | Receive-Job "PSJob"? "background job"? What does this mean?
$job = Get-WmiObject Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration -Filter 'IPEnabled=True' -ComputerName $server -AsJob $job | Wait-Job | Receive-JobSame thing both times.
\_(ツ)_/
- Edited by jrv Friday, September 30, 2016 4:08 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Did you check the methods returned on the objects because all the properties returned are the same its the methods that are not.
You cannot return methods from a job or a remote session. PowerShell can only serialize properties. If you wan tot use the methods then you must use tem inside the job that acquires the object.
\_(ツ)_/
------------------------------------
Reply:
except the PSJob does return an object with a SetDNSServerSearachOrder method.
But I will take that as an answer as to why my background job doesn't return the method. Thank you.
- Edited by ChrisSHirst Friday, September 30, 2016 7:09 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
except the PSJob does return an object with a SetDNSServerSearachOrder method.
But I will take that as an answer as to why my background job doesn't return the method. Thank you.
Yes - you are correct that they execute differently. I suspect a different marshalling method is used. It is a good point for further research.
Since we are sending a script block to the jobber and passing that to the remote it is likely that the wrapper is getting removed on the remote.
\_(ツ)_/
------------------------------------
RPC opnum bug in the Windows 10 RSAT Firewall snapin and
When we try to use the Remote Server Administration Tools Windows Firewall snap-in to connect to Server 2012 R2, no rules are listed. It connects properly to 2008 R2 and to 2012. When capturing the traffic between the Windows 10 box and each of the different server versions, we see that the RPC op number is different when attempting to query the rules. The op numbers are described here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc231568.aspx
When Windows 7 or 8 queries the 2012 R2 server, it uses opnum 69 (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj217552.aspx) successfully. When Windows 10 tries to query the same 2012 R2 server, it uses opnum 73 (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt182610.aspx) which the server replies is unsupported.
Based on the behavior of the clients, it appears that the snap-in is responsible for sending the correct op code based on the version of the server OS that it is connecting to rather than the OS being update to reflect changes (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd240216.aspx).
Not sure if there is any solution at this point other than to report it to MS and hope for a patch sometime soon.
Justin Cervero - MS Enterprise Admin - Appalachian State University
No comments:
Post a Comment