Probably BUG on Dependency tool
In SQL SERVER 2005 SP2 the dependency tool seem to work bad on view declared as the follow one:
SELECT QUERY1
UNION
SELECT QUERY2
The problem can be fixed rewriting the view as
SELECT QUERY1
UNION
SELECT QUERY2
Simone
WARNING ANOTHER KB UPDATE FOR VISTA x64
WARNING, Microsoft released another update!
At this moment in time we have 3 updates for Vista Ultimate x64:
KB932596, KB938979, KB941649
If you have one of them installed the: bcdedit -set loadoptions "DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS" function wil, stop functioning.
In other words, it will be impossible to load unsigned drivers.
Many people have problems and even internet connections, firewall programs like Peerguardian (freeware) will not function.
As programmer to be able to make a program that uses drivers, you must get them signed at Microsoft. This costs money.
It is of course a way of unfair business, by Microsoft. It is unreasonable to demand mony for a freware program for example.
If you don't want problems, and want to use unsigned drivers. Remove the mentioned updates.
ANOTHER DANGER:
Microsoft has plans to include these updates in Vista SP1, if Microsoft does this many people will be unable to use their programs. And even connect to the internet, with teir trusted firewall applications like for example Peerguardian.
Also:
It damages technological advance, if you are a programmer how can you write a new driver? Get your BETA builds signed??? It is insanity on the part of Microsoft.
Complain NOW!
In my opinion Microsoft should fire the guy, most responsible for these updates. Un do them, and defenetly not include them in SP1.
If they don't, they probably will get another million dollar fine by EU commisioner Nellie Kroes. Deserved this time I think!
Kindest regards,
Uncle X(NL)
November updates to The Configuration Manager Documentation Library
The Configuration Manager Documentation Library on TechNet has been updated for November. Many of the updates were added directly in response to customer requests and comments and questions that we saw here.
For a list of the new or updated topics, see "What's New in the Configuration Manager Documentation Library for November 2007" (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb892811.aspx). New and updated topics also say "Topic last updated—November 2007" so if you see a conflict with a previous version, trust the later date.
Discussions about a printable format are underway but no news there.
An updated November chm is still in the works but not available at this time. We'll keep you posted when we have that ready to download.
As always, we welcome your feedback and discussion about the documentation in the Documentation forum.
Step-by-Step guide for "How to Install a Configuration Manager 2007 Primary Site Using Custom Setup"
Hi,
I just created a Step-by-Step guide for "How to Install a Configuration Manager 2007 Primary Site Using Custom Setup" uploaded to below link...Welcome your feedback on any corrections or additions...
http://cid-8092d81ddc784c66.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/Configuration%20Manager%202007%20|5SCCM|6
Thanks
Shaminda
Reply:
------------------------------------
BizTalk - Data-driven application host server (?)
* as an integration engine, as an integration layer between applications (usually and as a data transformation layer);
* for the workflow applications (including the long-running workflows);
* as a host for Business Rule Engine applications.
I think the BizTalk Server is more then that.
Let's think of BizTalk Server as a generic Application Server.
Now we have the Windows Server OS as an Application Server. We have the IIS as the Application Server.
Windows can host the standalone applications and Windows service applications. We can start the applications by hand, schedule its start by the Scheduled Task utility, setup the special developed applications as the Windows Services.
IIS hosts the Web applications.
Let's look at the BizTalk Server as a generic Application Server. Application Server for our usual standalone applications.
What the advantages we have using the BizTalk as an Application Server for standalone applications?
Data-driven applications:
Somewhere in the system the data appears. It can be a new file copied in a folder, new file received by FTP, new data in SQL database, new messages in the message queue, new data in the SAP/R3 application, new e-mail. Those data triggered the BizTalk application.
Data is appeared and this starts the appropriate application.
Say a hundred new files appears in the folder (or a hundred rows appeared in the SQL database). And this starts a hundred appropriated applications to concurrently process this data.
This is not easy to implement this data-driven application management in the usual standalone application.
BizTalk implements many transport and application adapters to transfer data to/from BizTalk applications, like File, FTP, MSMQ, SAP/R3, JD Edwards, etc.
Long-running applications; data correlations:
Say our application sent data to the remote partner then after several minutes or days the partner modified data and sent it back. How can we facilitate the application to wait this response? How can the application survive the server restarts? How can we facilitate the situation when thousand applications are waiting the responses and flooding the server memory? How can we correlate the response data with appropriate application?
BizTalk by design works all these cases.
Scaling up and scaling out:
Having BizTalk as an Application Server the developers can redesign the architecture from big, monolithic application to the small, isolated business-unit application set. BizTalk helps to transfer data between those small applications, helps to correlate data. This ways to high scalable application. Moreover the BizTalk has the intrinsic functionality to manage the high availability and high performance requirements by the special host mechanism.
Yes, it's true that the data-driven applications get the well-organized data which definitely is the output from other applications. Is that mean we've returned to the point where we have gone because it means the old paradigm, the integration level where the BizTalk always was positioned?
The integration tool is the intermediate level tool. It is not the self-independent tool.
But seems the BizTalk is the self-independent Application Server for our usual standalone applications.
Regards,
OpsMgr SP1 RC (ROM)
Hi all,
I've just had a look at the release notes etc. for SP1 RC, and was wondering about any possible caveats in upgrading the RMS to SP1, given the fact that the SCE servers in gateway mode will be pre-SP1? I'll post in the SCE NG regarding SP1 for SCE...
Thanks,
Eugene
Reply:
Hi Eugene,
Just found you have another duplicated issue posted at "System Center Essentials - General" :
OpsMgrSP1 RC?
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2373488&SiteID=17
Therefore, I will mark this thread and lock it. Thank you.
At the same time, here is a RMS related document for your reference:
Microsoft's Remote Managed Services Solution for Partners
Sincerely,
Robbin Meng
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks. That seems to have answered the SCE issue, what I am still worried about is the impact of SP1 RC on a ROM env, such as what we have setup at the moment.
If we cannot upgrade SCE to SP1, then I assume asap we need to upgrade the OpsMgr gateway servers we have downstream?
(I realise this is not for a production env as yet, but need to plan ahead)
E
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hello Eugene,
So far, I have not been confirmed that SCE in "Service Provider" mode will be OK with the RMS running SP1 RC or eventually SP1 RTMv version. I am still researching on this issue.
Regarding upgrading SCE to SP1, personally, I think SCE SP1 should be released in the first half of year 2008. So far, we have not the list of the hotfixes which will be included into SP1. Also, I agree that we test SP1 in your test computers first, not for a production environment.
Thanks again.
Sincerely,
Robbin Meng
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks for the reply!
I would appreciate some feedback on the "SP" mode compatibility (don't mind testing it, but if I can save a few hours that would be welcome!). It is in any case something I imagine the ROM team would need to clarify, as there are partners like is deploying in increasing numbers.
Regards,
Eugene
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Eugene,
Regarding the compatibility of incoming SP1, this issue is still under research and discussion. I will keep you updated on this thread.
At the same time, if you have any feedback, please feel free to share it with us here. Thanks again for your time and efforts.
Sincerely,
Robbin Meng
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
please help me in terminal service in windows vista ultimate
dear all,
i have one vista ultimate pc and number of vista business pcs, now i can't access one server from my pc but i can access other servers and vista business pcs can access all server .
can any one help me??
thanks,
Reply:
Hi,
From your post, I understand that a Vista ultimate machine cannot terminal to a specific server (we call it "fail" server.).
To further analysis the issue, please help to confirm the following points:
- Is it a domain or workgroup environment?
- Is there any differences between the "work" servers and "fail" server? Such as the OS version, network segment.
- Is the "fail" server running Application Mode or Remote Administrative mode?
- Please capture the error message to me when the Vista ultimate machine cannot terminal to the "fail" server.
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
As this thread has been quiet for a while we will be changing the issue type to 'Comment'.
If you wish to return to this question you can go ahead and change the type back to 'Question'. Then you can edit your initial post and change the radio button at the top of the post editor window.
If the issue has been resolved, we'd love to hear your solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
network problem
my computer cant connect to another computer in our house the other computer can access this one but this just comes up with network diagnostics which doesnt know wots wrong trying to have a battle on starcraft
Reply:
Hi Sativa,
Please understand that we have not enough information about how starcraft works, but I will try my best to check if it is a networking issue.
Before we go further, I would like to confirm the following points with you:
1. Are all computers running Windows Vista?
2. Can the problematic computer access share folder on the other computers?
3. Does it work if you turn off the firewall on all computers?
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Sativa,
As this thread has been quiet for a while we will be changing the issue type to 'Comment'.
If you wish to return to this question you can go ahead and change the type back to 'Question'. Then you can edit your initial post and change the radio button at the top of the post editor window.
If the issue has been resolved, we'd love to hear your solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Windows Vista laptop and 2000 Server Environment
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dirk
Reply:
Hi Dirk,
Do you mean there is a share folder but it fails to add to the Windows 2000 Active Directory? Or there is share folder on Windows 2000 Domain Controller, but it fails to be accessed on the Vista laptop?
For further analysis, please provide the following information:
- Does the Vista join the domain?
- Is the Vista using wireless or wired network to connect DC?
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Dirk,
As this thread has been quiet for a while we will be changing the issue type to 'Comment'.
If you wish to return to this question you can go ahead and change the type back to 'Question'. Then you can edit your initial post and change the radio button at the top of the post editor window.
If the issue has been resolved, we'd love to hear your solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Joson Zhou
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Remote Console logon Failure
Having trouble logging in remotely using the SCE console. I think the reason is the same as the reporting issue fixed in the hotrollup.
The computer on which you try to install Essentials 2007 has a NetBIOS domain name that does not match the first part of the FQDN of the domain. For example, the NetBIOS domain name is CONTOSO-XYZ. However, the domain is named contoso.com instead of contoso-xyz.com.
Now the HotRollUp fix fixed the installation on the server. I don't want to sit in the server room in the cold but would rather use the SCE console on my laptop at the comfort of my desk, it installs ok, but I cannot connect to the server as it doesn't like my credentials. The domain is setup as above which I think is the issue.
I cannot run the hotrollup on the client as it says SCE is not installed, anyone else come across this?
Reply:
The remote console does not require any hotfix.
Please validate that the certificates from the SCE Server install directory "Certificates" folder have been imported to the Trusted Root Authorities store on the remote UI machine. Also, the WSUSCodeSigningCert.cer should be imported to the Third Party Publishers and Third Party Trusted Root authorities stores.
Also, ensure you give the FQDN of the SCE Server when trying to connect to the remote machine, and you are logged in as a user which is an administrator on the SCE server.
If this still fails, please post the error the console gives in this thread to help narrow the problem.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Still no luck where can I dump some screen shots?
------------------------------------
Reply:
Please use the following post to send info to the SCE team for review:
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1680389&SiteID=17
Also, if the console is giving an error message that expands, you should be able to copy the internal text and post it here.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Richard,
As this thread has been quiet for a while we will be changing the issue type to 'Comment'.
If you wish to return to this question you can go ahead and change the type back to 'Question'. Then you can edit your initial post and change the radio button at the top of the post editor window.
If the issue has been resolved, we'd love to hear your solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
-----------------------------
Sincerely,
Guozhen Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Microsoft Deployment - Replaces BDD 2007
For those who do not know, BDD 2007 has been replaced/updated with Windows Deployment.
It is similar to BDD 2007, but upgraded with additional features and more in line with Enterprise deployment tools from MS.
Ideas
Something else that has come to my attention is that in small enerpricess when there is a sistem failure to restore it takes longer than it could. All recent sistems have backups for restoring the operation sistem When it would be easier to have a full sistem back up that restarts inmediatly the O/S from a diferent location or hardware. It is easier to start working with the same software with the same actualizations than to restore the old one. To have an executable back up sistem that is totaly independent from the data back up might create a solution even for individul users.
Whith the constant increase of new and better hardware and requirements of softwares to work properly a future solution might be to see a CPU as a single componento of a larger computer. A cheaper solution for the future is not only to increase the performance of the computers by updating the hard ware only. By findig a way to easily fusion more than one CPU for a single program...
The TCP/IP protocols and setings should be something that can be individulay modified, I mean even to the point of modifying the registry values.
(if some one reads this please understand that spanish is my native lenguage) And now that is night time I have to stop day dreaming. Thank You.
NOLOCK/ROWLOCK (good or bad guys?)
Reading about avoiding deadlocks in SQL, I have found different opnions about whether using or not NOLOCK/ROWLOCK hints on SELECT/UPDATE/DELETE statements. I have several applications executing transactions on the same databases and tables, including inserts, updates and deletes. I wonder if by using NOLOCK/ROWLOCK I could decrease the chances of having deadlocks. At least using ROWLOCK on my update statements?. I just need some advice here.
Regards.
Reply:
Well, the advice kind of depends on the need and type of environment you are working in. You would want to utilize locks if Dirty Reads are absolutely unacceptable, but remember that if you are utilizing a lock on an update that you are actually putting 2 locks in place, one for the delete and another for the insert. Utilizing rowlocks can help preserve data integrity, but can also cost data access, and the wrong implementation can easily cause Deadlocks, which is what it seems you are trying to prevent.
-Jay Soares
------------------------------------
Reply:
A lot depends on why you are having deadlocks. Rowlock is almost certainly going to do the same things as you are seeing now. Nolock is just insane in my mind, unless the data is just for a quick overview. Reading in dirty data as good data makes your programs far less supportable.
I don't know your skill level, so this may seem condescending, so forgive me, but before applying real brain power to a broad problem like this, there are a few things to ask:
1. Do your UPDATE and DELETE statements work of Primary or Unique constraints? Or at the very least well indexed columns, if doing multiple rows? If the statement doesn't use an index, it will do a table scan, locking more of the table than you probabably want (even the entire table.) Rowlock would possibly help here, but it would essentially just take longer.
2. How many concurrent users are we talking about. A few, or hundreds?
3. How many statements are usually involved in your transactions that deadlock? Single statements? Or multiples in a transaction?
Once you have done all that you can to avoid deadlocks, the best thing to do is to handle them, by having the application "try again" when that error message is seen. If you have your calls neatly tied up in transactions, this is easy. If you are doing multiple statements outside of a transaction, it can be less easy. But in each case, if you can isolate the transaction that deadlocked, retrying should be easy enough.
------------------------------------
Thanks
Printer attached to print server
Hello,
I am currently having a problem getting a printer to work on a machine that I've installed Windows SteadyState on.
- I've installed SteadyState on a machine that logs into itself (not a domain).
- The printer that I wish to map to has a static IP and is managed through a print server that is on our domain.
- I have mapped to the printer using \\print_server_name\printer_name and printed a test page which worked.
- After ensuring the printer was configured I began to configure the SteadyState restrictions.
- I've left the Prevent users from add / remove printers option unchecked.
- I've also left the Remove printers icon unchecked
-
- When I enable the SteadyState settings I am unable to print and I receive an error message basically telling me that it is having issues finding the printer.
Is there a setting somewhere that I've over looked? If anyone has any ideas or requires further information I'd be pleased to hear / provide any additional details.
Chris Maddeaux
Reply:
Hi Chris,
First of all, please let me know the exact error message and the background infomation if there is.
I suggest we change the restriction level of SteadyState to check this issue: Firstly, you can create a new user profile with "No restrictions". If you can print, we can change its level to "Low restrictions"
…
Until the issue reoccurs, we can compare the differences between two levels and find the root cause gradually.
Best Regards,
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hello and sorry for the delay in responding.
The error is as follows:
Windows cannot print due to a problem with the current printer setup.
Try one or more of the following:
* Check the printer by printing a test page from Windows.
* Make sure the printer is turned on and online.
* Reinstall the printer driver.
I will reset the security settings and work my way up from low and see if the error still occurs.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your feedback.
Usually, security warning/error will be received if the issue is caused by restrictions. Thus, the above error may not be caused by SteadyState. If the issue persists when No Restriction is configured, you may need to obtain further assistance from Windows XP Hardware newsgroup, or the Hardware manufacturer:
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other customers who read the newsgroups regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
Regards,
------------------------------------
Server Manager update for WSUS 3.0 SP1 available for download
Server Manager is a new feature in Windows Server 2008 that guides administrators through the process of installing, configuring, and managing Windows Server 2008 roles and features. In addition to roles and features that are included with Windows Server 2008 by default, Server Manager enables integration of additional roles and features that are available on the Microsoft Download Center and Windows Update Web sites as optional updates to Windows Server 2008. One role that will be available as an update is Windows Server Update Services 3.0 Service Pack 1 (WSUS 3.0 SP1). An update will also be released that enables full integration of WSUS 3.0 SP1 into Server Manager. This update allows installation, configuration, and management of WSUS 3.0 SP1 by using the Server Manager console and wizards.
To test the Server Manager update and obtain customer feedback, Microsoft offers a four-week Beta program for this update, starting November 2, 2007 on the Microsoft Connect site. By participating in the Beta program, you have the opportunity to try the new WSUS 3.0 SP1 role with full Server Manager integration, and provide feedback directly to the Server Manager teams. If you are interested in participating, the download is available at http://connect.microsoft.com/windows/Downloads/DownloadDetails.aspx?DownloadID=9315. For more information or questions, please contact smcpe@microsoft.com.
Exposing a Connected Property on the Data View Web Part (DFWP) to pass in CAML Queries
The Data Form Web Part (called Data View in SharePoint Designer) is a very versatile web part. While offering an XSLT transform for layout purposes, there are various features such as sorting, filtering and paging. However, when it comes to content management, all of the configuration is in the page layout which requires interaction with SharePoint Designer. This makes it difficult for a content editor to configure things such as filtering from the browser.
Cale Hoopes
caleh@ascentium.com
http://calehoopes.blogspot.com
Configuring MOSS as a Search Appliance with Keywords and Best Bets against a non-MOSS source
Hopefully it will help someone out!
http://calehoopes.blogspot.com/2007/11/configuring-moss-as-search-appliance.html
Enjoy!
Cale Hoopes
caleh@ascentium.com
http://calehoope.blogspot.com
Windows Explorer Stopped Working.
1.Restart the computer with safe mode with Command Prompt.
2.Open User Accounts Window using command "netplwiz".
3.Create new user account.
4.Then log into new user account.
5.Copy all the files from old user account to New user account.
6.Delete the old user account.
Issue is Fixed !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Health service host process error
Since yesterday, I always get this error every minutes,
Health Service Host Prcess encountered a problem and needed to close.
This error occured on 11/5/2007 at 10:30:35 AM
Please tell SRV-SCE07_MG about this problem.
We have created an error report that you can send to help us improve
Health Service Host Process. We will treat this report as confidential and anonymous.
I try to find if some services are stop but everything run ok. On this server, I only have Win 2k3 std sp2, SCE 07 et SQL express 05.
It's an IBM X3205 with 4 Gb ram and 75 Gb HDD Raid 1.
Thx for your help !
David
Reply:
Would you check the Operations Manager Event Log on the affected host and let us know if you see any error messages there that may give us some insight into root cause?
------------------------------------
Reply:
OpsMgr Connector
Failed to store data in the Data Warehouse.
Exception 'SqlException': Sql execution failed. Error 777971002, Level 13, State 1, Procedure AemEventProcessStaging, Line 313, Message: Sql execution failed. Error 1205, Level 13, State 51, Procedure AemEventProcessStaging, Line 222, Message: Transaction (Process ID 117) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.SystemCenter.DataWarehouse.StandardDataSetMaintenance
Instance name: Client Monitoring data set
Instance ID: {1954C50F-063E-ED80-9037-A11D009788A2}
Management group: SRV-SCE07_MG
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
HealthService
The constructor for the managed module type "Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DatabaseQueryModules.GroupCalculationModule" threw an exception. This module was running in rule "Microsoft.SystemCenter.WindowsComputer.IPSubnet.PopulateGroup" running for instance "127.0.0.0" with id:"{A1BD10CC-9996-26E1-65A0-8215A58F5B2B}" in management group "SRV-SCE07_MG". The exception text is: Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DatabaseQueryModules.InvalidDatabaseQueryModuleConfigurationException: RelationshipTypeId = 6068f699-56a0-8ce1-f625-701a148a219b
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DatabaseQueryModules.MembershipSubscription.ValidateRelationshipType(Guid relationshipTypeId, Guid sourceManagedTypeId, Guid targetManagedTypeId)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DatabaseQueryModules.MembershipSubscription.Create(IXPathNavigable configurationXml, RelationshipQueryResultMethod relationshipQueryResultMethod, NotifyFatalErrorMethod notifyFatalErrorMethod)
at Microsoft.EnterpriseManagement.Mom.DatabaseQueryModules.GroupCalculationModule..ctor(ModuleHost`1 moduleHost, XmlReader configuration, Byte[] previousState)
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
I had performed some search on the event logs which you mentioned in your previous post. And it seems not related to health service failure.
So could you please help to save the Operations Manager section to *.evt files and capture screen shots of the related symptoms( the "Health Service Host Prcess encountered a problem and needed to close" error message), then send them to scedata@microsoft.com .
Note:
Please include the following three lines in the email body:
Health service host process error
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?postid=2371907&siteid=17
Guo-zhen Wang - MSFT
Regarding more information about how to send email to SCEDATA@microsoft.com, please refer to:
How to send files to the Microsoft SCE team for review
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1680389&SiteID=17
Post a quick note in the current thread after sending the email.
Thanks!
-----------------------------
Sincerely,
Guozhen Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
As this thread has been quiet for a while we will be changing the issue type to 'Comment'.
If you wish to return to this question you can go ahead and change the type back to 'Question'. Then you can edit your initial post and change the radio button at the top of the post editor window.
If the issue has been resolved, we'd love to hear your solution. By sharing your experience you can help other community members facing similar problems.
Thanks!
-----------------------------
Sincerely,
Guozhen Wang
Microsoft Online Community Support
------------------------------------