IE10 - Win7 - menubar to top
Is there a way to get the menubar located back at the top. There were registry entries that would allow it in previous versions but these do not work on IE10.
Thanks
- Edited by SAPaleAle2 Saturday, November 17, 2012 5:11 PM
- Changed type Nicholas Li Friday, December 7, 2012 7:43 AM
Reply:
Hi,
May I know if this is the method you mentioned? I just noticed it is for Internet Explorer 7 or Internet Explorer 8.
How do I move the Standard toolbar to a location that is above the Address bar in Internet Explorer 7 or Internet Explorer 8?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930645
If you have feedbacks about Internet Explorer 10, please visit the following page and submit it:
https://connect.microsoft.com/IE/Feedback
Thanks.
Nicholas Li
TechNet Community Support
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
Yes that is the method I tried and it currently doesn't work with IE10 on Win7
The feedback area seems to be more for reporting bugs and this isn't a bug its just a missing "feature" or a lack of user customisation :)
Thanks
- Edited by SAPaleAle2 Wednesday, November 21, 2012 12:17 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
Thanks for your update.
Based on my understanding, I think this is due to design change of the new version of Internet Explorer.Nicholas Li
TechNet Community Support
------------------------------------
page method to check user authentication
i write following javascript to checkuser authentication to check that should actually use a web method whether user is authenticated or not ..
function Checksession() {
var checksession=PageMethods.GetSession(onSucess, onError);
if(checksession==false)
{
window.location = "Login.aspx";
}
}
and my webmethod is
[WebMethod]
public static bool GetSession()
{
return System.Web.HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated;
}
but with unlock i am not getting any result ...
Bibek
- Edited by Bibek Gautam Monday, December 3, 2012 9:51 AM
- Moved by Jason Dot Wang Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:59 AM This thread is about ASP.NET (From:JScript for the .NET Framework)
Reply:
Hi Bibek Gautam,
Welcome to MSDN Forum Support.
You are more likely to get more efficient responses to ASP.NET issues at http://forums.asp.net where you can contact ASP.NET experts.
Sincerely,
Jason Wang
Jason Wang [MSFT]
MSDN Community Support | Feedback to us
------------------------------------
Customization of windows 8 start menu.
If objFSO.FileExists("C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Accessories\Skype.lnk") Then
Set objFolder = objShell.Namespace("C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Accessories")
Set objFolderItem = objFolder.ParseName("Skype.lnk")
Set colVerbs = objFolderItem.Verbs
For Each objVerb in colVerbs
If Replace(objVerb.name, "&", "") = "Pin to Taskbar" Then objVerb.DoIt
If Replace(objVerb.name, "&", "") = "Pin to Start" Then objVerb.DoIt
Next
End If
Am created and placed a shortcut of skype at location[C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Accessories\] ,using above script i am trying to pin 'skype' on start menu and task bar,its working for task bar but not for pinning to start menu , Could any one suggest me for reason of this.What's wrong in script.
Reply:
I think it is better to post in MSDN forum
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/windowsapps
------------------------------------
IE10
I use IE 10 the youtube for html5 is good watch movie
but the ie9 can not use html5 watch movie
Reply:
Hi,
You can refer to following thread:
IE9 HTML5 video tag?
Regards,
Vincent Wang
TechNet Community Support
------------------------------------
How can I access a sharepoint site out side of the SharePoint Vrtual Machine
Hi All,
I created a site in SharePoint 2010 virtual server successfully. Its working fine on the same virutual server(I can open the url). But when I copy the same url and paste it in another machine. Its not accessible and displaying the below error msg . I even tried giving the url instead server name. But all my efforts gone in vain. Please help me.
application:SP 2010-standalone
server - widnows 2008 r2
My url looks like this : http://hostname/my/personal/teamblog/default.aspx
Error msg:
| <big>Network Error (dns_unresolved_hostname)</big> |
| Your requested host "server name" could not be resolved by DNS. |
For assistance, contact your network support team. |
Thanks,
Rohu
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Yes I tried with the IP too. I even tried by giving the ip instead hostname. Its asking the credentials after providing the credentials with domain id its nt connecting. Pl let me know the steps to reister it in the domain DNS.
thanks,
rohu
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi
beacause you can;t browse your page using URL, is caused by name solving issue
To check if that
from your client machine use
>nslookup hostname
Instead of DNS server, you can configure easier lmhosts file with SHP server's ip address and name
If you use IP address, be sure that you use the TCP port
like
http://IP_Address:TCP_port/my/personal/teamblog/default.aspx
Regarding authentication,
first, configure a site collection on your web app, and permit non-authenticated user to access it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIxjKImNLUQ
Next, for authenticated pages, try only user name ( not with domain infos ) and password (ALSO check if that user had granted correct permissions level to the site )
Romeo Donca, Orange Romania (MCSE, MCITP, CCNA) Please Mark As Answer if my post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if the post has been helpful for you.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hello Romeo,
I have followed your steps by using port no and IP combination but still the site is not accessible.
To All- Please somebody help me. How to access a sharepoint test site which is created on a lab test server from another machine/laptop/desktop.
When I try to access the error msg:
Error msg:
| <big>Network Error (dns_unresolved_hostname)</big> |
| Your requested host "server name" could not be resolved I request you please dont repeat the same answer which were already given. thanks in advance, rohu
|
- Edited by ronan22 Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:10 AM
------------------------------------
Transactional replication primary key violation
- Edited by SaiKumar G Sunday, December 2, 2012 4:17 AM
Reply:
Hello,
Please see the following resources:
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/2469/handling-data-consistency-errors-in-sql-server-transactional-replication/
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms151331(v=SQL.105).aspx
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com
------------------------------------
Reply:
HI ,
Please find below link for avoid of Replication error
http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/the-identity-crisis-in-replication/
RAM
------------------------------------
SCOM 2007 R2 - How to exclude the IIS 7 Default Website
- Moved by Robert Marshall - MVPMVP Saturday, December 1, 2012 2:59 PM Moving to correct forum (From:Configuration Manager 2007 General)
- Changed type Nicholas Li Tuesday, December 4, 2012 7:50 AM
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
I noticed the following thread about the same topic, please continue the discussion here:
SCOM 2007 R2 - How do i exclude the IIS 7 default website from monitoring?
Thanks for your understanding and cooperation.Nicholas Li
TechNet Community Support
------------------------------------
WSUS REPLICA SERVER CONFIGURATION.........
Hi,
We have 02 standalone WSUS server one at San Francisco and other at Crawley . The configuration of both the servers are different mainly "computer groups" . I have an assignment to configure the crawley WSUS server as downstream & SFO WSUS as upstream server . My main concern is about the groups & computers that are existing in crawley server . Once i will configure crawley server as replica server , then all the setting of upstream will be copied to downstream server and overwrite the configuration of crawley .
Please suggest the steps to perform this configuration successfully .
Reply will be really appreciable .............
- Moved by Kent AgerlundMVP Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:55 PM (From:Configuration Manager 2012 - General)
- Changed type Clarence Zhang Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:45 AM
Reply:
Once i will configure crawley server as replica server , then all the setting of upstream will be copied to downstream server and overwrite the configuration of crawley .
Correct.
The BEST steps to perform this configuration successfully is to RE-install the Crawley server as a brand-new fresh REPLICA of the SFO server.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA, MCSA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2012)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
------------------------------------
Reply:
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
We have 02 standalone WSUS server one at San Francisco and other at Crawley . The configuration of both the servers are different mainly "computer groups" . I have an assignment to configure the crawley WSUS server as downstream & SFO WSUS as upstream server . My main concern is about the groups & computers that are existing in crawley server . Once i will configure crawley server as replica server , then all the setting of upstream will be copied to downstream server and overwrite the configuration of crawley .
Please suggest the steps to perform this configuration successfully .
Reply will be really appreciable .............
- Merged by Clarence Zhang Monday, December 3, 2012 9:31 AM same
------------------------------------
Reply:
Once i will configure crawley server as replica server , then all the setting of upstream will be copied to downstream server and overwrite the configuration of crawley .
Correct.
The BEST steps to perform this configuration successfully is to RE-install the Crawley server as a brand-new fresh REPLICA of the SFO server.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA, MCSA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Distribution (2005-2012)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Lawrence.Garvin
------------------------------------
RBAC Role - Read only on Send As & Full Mailbox Access
Hi
We have recently rolled out Exchange 2010 SP2. I would like to create a custom RBAC Role for our IT Helpdesk that gives them view only recipient access and also view only access to the Manage Send As & Manage Full Access Permissions.
I created new management role based upon the Active Directory Permissions and removed the Add-ADPermission and Remove-ADPermission, but this didnt do the trick - it just removes the Manage Send As and Full Access.
Can anyone advise on the best way to do this?
Thans
Reply:
When you click the "Send as" box in the GUI it runs the Get-ADPermission command against the distinguished name. What happens when you run the following as a helpdesk member? Do they have rights to view the object in AD?
Get-ADPermission -Identity 'CN=MailboxName,OU=MailboxLocation,DC=Domain,DC=com' | Where-Object {$_.ExtendedRights -like "*Send-As*"}
------------------------------------
Project Server 2010 and Outlook/Exchange Server integration
Discussion:
Given the direct integration between Project Server 2010 and Exchange Server, it would be nice to have features for booking e.g. vacation, meetings and courses in Outlook and have it reflected in Project Server, so that this time is unavailable for projects.
In November 2009 this was written in a TechNet blog: ‘Project Server 2010 now integrates directly with Exchange Server 2007 SP2 or later’ and further ‘If your users want to update task status via Outlook’. (http://blogs.technet.com/b/projectadministration/archive/2009/11/18/microsoft-project-server-2010-requirements.aspx)
I want my users to book their vacation and courses directly in Outlook (which they already use), instead of only updating task status!
- Changed type Jan Ulrich Jensen Wednesday, September 8, 2010 6:45 AM Proposed improvement
- Changed type Gary Chefetz, MCITP, MCT, MVP Thursday, September 9, 2010 9:12 PM Is a question not a general discussion
- Edited by Jan Ulrich Jensen Monday, September 13, 2010 7:51 AM It's a discussion
- Changed type Jan Ulrich Jensen Monday, September 13, 2010 7:52 AM Not a question
Reply:
Hi,
Unfortunately the capability to create items in your calendar and have that picked up by Project Server is not available, but I agree it would be nice. There may be an option to build something that achieves this using the Project Server API and updates the relevant users calendar. Might make a nice project for someone :)
Hope this helps,
Alex
Alex Burton
www.epmsource.com | Twitter
Project Server TechCenter | Project Developer Center | Project Server Help | Project Product Page
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi,
I was facing the same need by my users. So I did a web research and found a product called Allocatus. It doing the job us. If you want to give it a try, here's the link: http://www.allocatus.com.
Hope this helps,
Peter
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Jan,
in Project Server 2013, there is an integration which (supposedly) reads all out-of-office appointments and marks these time as absence in the resource calendar. However, I'm am still waiting for an installation instruction.
------------------------------------
Resource Domain for Integrated Back Up solution
My company manages IT for four seperate organisations.
It has been discussed to merge the Back up environment onto an integrated off site appliance type solution
Could this be managed in a resource domain?
Please could some one advise on this matter
Reply:
Benyon35,
We have two companies that are backed up on a single server, I use Microsoft Baremetal Backups along with an rsync (backup assist) solutions (only uploads changed files). I can't see there being a problem if you are using a resource domain, as long as they aren't all on their own domains shut off from the world.
"solutions are not always answers" - Richard M. Nixon
------------------------------------
FIM-TROUBLESHOOTING: Installation Error: 25009: Cannot create more than one clustered index on table 'dbo.mms_connectorspace'
FIM-TROUBLESHOOTING: Installation Error: 25009: Cannot create more than one clustered index on table 'dbo.mms_connectorspace':http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14775.fim-troubleshooting-error-25009-the-forefront-identity-manager-synchronization-service-setup-wizard-cannot-configure-the-specified-database.aspx
In addition, because we have several TechNet Wiki's involving the 25009 error, I have a single blog that contains all three links.
FIM-TROUBLESHOOTING: FIM Synchronization Service Engine installation fails with 25009 error: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ms-identity-support/archive/2012/07/26/installation-fim-synchronization-service-engine-fails-with-25009-error.aspx
Tim Macaulay Security Identity Support Team Support Escalation Engineer
Forgot xbox id.
- Moved by JOshiro Monday, December 3, 2012 7:56 PM Xbox question (From:Live Connect)
Reply:
Please ask this on the Xbox forum instead:
------------------------------------
Windows 8's upgrade pace behind Vista!
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9234216/Windows_8_uptake_More_like_Vista_than_Windows_7
Full quote:
----
After a month on the market, Windows 8's usage uptake resembles 2007's Vista -- ultimately a poor performer for Microsoft -- rather than the eventually successful Windows 7, a Web measurement company said Saturday.
According to Net Applications, 1.2% of all Windows PCs ran Windows 8 during November, more than double its share the month before..
Windows 8's gains last month were lackluster compared to Windows 7's in late 2009. By the end of that upgrade's first full month at retail, it had captured 4.3% of all Windows.
Windows 8's November gain was its best-ever since Net Applications began tracking the new operating system. Even so, it fell further behind Windows 7's pace. In 2009, Windows 7 added 2 percentage points in its first month after launch, while Windows 8 added only seven-tenths of a point, less than a half as much.
In fact, Windows 8 may have trouble keeping pace with Vista. By the end of Vista's second month, it accounted for 2.2% of all copies of Windows. To equal that, Windows 8 will have to add another full percentage point to its share in December.
...
The usage data also bolsters analysis of Microsoft's assertion that it sold 40 million Windows 8 licenses -- a number the company said is "in line" with Windows 7's first month. Experts did not dispute the 40 million, but noted that many of those licenses were tied to PCs that had not yet been sold to customers, and so Microsoft's number did not represent Windows 8's real-world use.
-----------------
Let's not forget that Vista was released for the general customers in January 30 2007. Well after the black friday and christmas seasons, and it was also far more expensive than Windows 8.. still did better! But of course, Win8's poor performance has nothing to do with the GUI, that thing is just perfect...
- Changed type Juke Chou Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:52 AM
Reply:
Win8 would have been nowhere right now if Microsoft did not a have monopoly situation. Now, consumers who buy PCs and notebooks at major retailers have no choice than to get Win8. They cannot downgrade to Win7 machines bought at stores. So, they are a captive audience for Microsoft. And the degree you see any utilization, this is it. It is a "forced" utilization because these consumers cannot buy anything else. If one put the same machines side to side with one running Win8 and the other running Win7, most consumers would have picked up the Win7 machine. Now, people have to eat the food that Microsoft is force-feeding them.http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9234216/Windows_8_uptake_More_like_Vista_than_Windows_7
Full quote:
----
After a month on the market, Windows 8's usage uptake resembles 2007's Vista -- ultimately a poor performer for Microsoft -- rather than the eventually successful Windows 7, a Web measurement company said Saturday.
According to Net Applications, 1.2% of all Windows PCs ran Windows 8 during November, more than double its share the month before..
Windows 8's gains last month were lackluster compared to Windows 7's in late 2009. By the end of that upgrade's first full month at retail, it had captured 4.3% of all Windows.
Windows 8's November gain was its best-ever since Net Applications began tracking the new operating system. Even so, it fell further behind Windows 7's pace. In 2009, Windows 7 added 2 percentage points in its first month after launch, while Windows 8 added only seven-tenths of a point, less than a half as much.
In fact, Windows 8 may have trouble keeping pace with Vista. By the end of Vista's second month, it accounted for 2.2% of all copies of Windows. To equal that, Windows 8 will have to add another full percentage point to its share in December.
...
The usage data also bolsters analysis of Microsoft's assertion that it sold 40 million Windows 8 licenses -- a number the company said is "in line" with Windows 7's first month. Experts did not dispute the 40 million, but noted that many of those licenses were tied to PCs that had not yet been sold to customers, and so Microsoft's number did not represent Windows 8's real-world use.
-----------------
Let's not forget that Vista was released for the general customers in January 30 2007. Well after the black friday and christmas seasons, and it was also far more expensive than Windows 8.. still did better! But of course, Win8's poor performance has nothing to do with the GUI, that thing is just perfect...
------------------------------------
Reply:
People do not like change and that is the bottom line. As a whole Windows 7 is a much better OS as of stability and function because it has much more time on the table for them to fix the issues that they had with it. You might not like the changes that they made to the OS but you can also still buy Windows 7 from a retailer like Newegg or TigerDirect or even Microsoft themselves and downgrade the machine. You are not able to choose 7 in stores because as a whole Windows 8 is the newest and biggest thing and people, although not all, want to have it. Windows 8 has untold potential because of power-shell but until companies and retailers alike utilize the full potential of it (just like on 7) there will be people that don't like it and issues that will arise with it.
Giving Feedback is probably the most important thing you can do to help the product but constant badgering and belligerent comments get you no where and get them no where as well.
P.S. If you do not like Windows 8, buy and construct your own machine and put 7 on it, most people who know and work on computers all day do this, you might look into it yourself :D.
------------------------------------
Reply:
People do not like change and that is the bottom line.
No, the bottom line is that you are new to the this forum and missed the dozens of huge posts about W8's deficiencies (sorry if that sounded a bit rude, didn't mean it). I for one welcome change, if change would be for the better. Win8 isn't. I've used dozens of various UIs, mostly without much problems (even exotic stuff like rare DOS shells), but Win8.. is just galling. It just feels as if it is not designed for computers in the first place but for handheld devices, and was slapped onto a desktop OS as an afterthought.
Windows 8 is the newest and biggest thing and people, although not all, want to have it.
The statistics so far prove otherwise.
Giving Feedback is probably the most important thing you can do to help the product but constant badgering and belligerent comments get you no where and get them no where as well. - We gave feedback! Problem is we got ignored and the response was just silence, nothing else.
Windows 8 has untold potential because of power-shell - because of power shell? In all the discussions about Windows 8 so far, you're the only one who mentioned PS as as some breakthrough W8 feature. What's the difference between power shell 3 on Win8 and Win7?
- Edited by VeryBoringNickname Monday, December 3, 2012 5:20 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
People do not like change and that is the bottom line. As a whole Windows 7 is a much better OS as of stability and function because it has much more time on the table for them to fix the issues that they had with it. You might not like the changes that they made to the OS but you can also still buy Windows 7 from a retailer like Newegg or TigerDirect or even Microsoft themselves and downgrade the machine. You are not able to choose 7 in stores because as a whole Windows 8 is the newest and biggest thing and people, although not all, want to have it. Windows 8 has untold potential because of power-shell but until companies and retailers alike utilize the full potential of it (just like on 7) there will be people that don't like it and issues that will arise with it.
Giving Feedback is probably the most important thing you can do to help the product but constant badgering and belligerent comments get you no where and get them no where as well.
P.S. If you do not like Windows 8, buy and construct your own machine and put 7 on it, most people who know and work on computers all day do this, you might look into it yourself :D.
First of all, it is not an issue of change. This is a forum of technophiles, we are all very much interesting in change. However, not all change is for the best. You would need to illustrate to us here as to why (a) the change was needed and (b) the benefits for the change. We are just not rats in a maze in which somebody has misplaced our cheese!!!
My comments are not belligerent at all. I would actually invite you here in this forum to demonstrate the "untold potential" of Win8 (Powershell? What is different about Powershell in Win8???)
------------------------------------
NetDepict - Network Device Discovery and Mapping Tool
Visio 2003 Autodiscovery feature was replaced by the Visio Enterprise Network Tools add-in that is no longer available. While looking for an inexpensive alternative, I came across a product that looks interesting.
NetDepict is a $65 tool that is supposed to perform a network discovery through a SNMP walk and export the results to Visio. Its YouTube video looks impressive. However its marketing makes it look suspect. There are far too many "reviews" that are an exact copy of each other. The only what looks to be independent comment was from 2010, and they said they could not get it to even run.
Has anyone tried this product, or does it just look too good to be true?
Thanks,
bk
- Changed type Jaynet Zhang Tuesday, December 4, 2012 8:55 AM
Isolating or eliminating the task of encoding in RDP 8.0's RemoteFX encoder
After having seen how Windows 7 delivers the 3DMark06 benchmark graphics tests and found the user experience to be superior to that delivered by Windows 8, all other conditions being equal, I am very interested in identifying which component in RDP 8's RemoteFX is responsible for bringing down the monitor capture rate so heavily with respect to what Windows 7 is capable of doing.
Broadly speaking, it appears to be the Adaptive Graphics Remote FX encoder that is responsible for throttling the monitor capture rate. I would like to verify this by either isolating the encoding task on a separate GPU (I do not have a separate ASIC encoder at present) or by eliminating it wholly.
Can anyone suggest means of achieving either isolation or elimination of the RemoteFX encoder in a lab setup?
Cheers,
Etienne
- Changed type Clarence Zhang Thursday, December 6, 2012 6:09 AM
Reply:
Hi Etienne, thanks for bringing this to the light!
Confirmed capture frame rate drop here and yes, there's a way to confirm it is related to RDP 8.0 pipeline.
With the below setup you may see that "vm render frame rate" (shown by 3dmark) remains the same, but capture frame rate is higher and generally you can deliver a better user experience (provided your connection is LAN based) when using RemoteFX v1 (7.1) pipeline in VDI+vGPU Server 2012 environment.
Please note that RemoteFX v1 pipeline on Server 2012 is a legitimate thing and expected [told] to be long-living feature.
Here's how you enforce RemoteFX v1 pipeline for your tests:
Enable RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility settings in Group Policy Editor for Remote Desktop Session Host environment in your VM (please also set highest quality and maximum capture rate settings as well). Then use clean-installed Win7SP1 as a client to your Win8 VM inside Server 2012 (make sure there are NO rdp 8.0 updates applied to your Windows 7 SP1 client box). Keep in mind you'll have to do all the things on the client/server side you did when you were testing 2008R2SP1 RemoteFX VDI environment (client setting to LAN connection, 32bpp session enforcement in both server and client, adding user to remote access group).
[feel free to contact me at vladislav dot kulikov at nicetyproject dot com]
Regards,
Vladislav
- Edited by Nicetyproject Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:08 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hello Vlad,
Thank you for your detailed feedback and please pardon the delay in replying.
I measured the performance of RemoteFX under the following conditions:
(a) W8EE VM; GP on VM set to disable RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility; W7SP1 client
(b) W8EE VM; GP on VM set to enable RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility and GP on VM set for medium screen capture rate and medium image quality; W7SP1 client
(c) W8EE VM; GP on VM set to enable RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility and GP on VM set for high screen capture rate and high image quality; W7SP1 client (three times)
(d) W8EE VM; GP on VM for RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility not configured and GP on VM set for Lossless image quality in RemoteFX Adaptive graphics; W8EE client
(e) W8EE VM; GP on VM for RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility not configured and GP on VM set for medium image quality in RemoteFX Adaptive graphics; W8EE client
(f) W7EE VM; default GPs; W7 client
Notes
(a) All tests were run on a 100Mb/s isolated LAN and used 3DMark06 as the test material.
(b) It has been found that, within empirical tolerance, the 3DMark06 detailed scores for graphics tests are equal to the performance monitor counter "Input frames/s", or as you usefully put it, the "VM render frame rate". This was found useful for the Windows 7 VM using RDP 7.1, which does not expose the RemoteFX Graphics "Input frames/s" counter.
Results summary
1. Windows 7 client and Windows 8 VM
1.1 Essentially, the policy to enable RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility has no effect on the user experience at a W7 client. In retrospect, this is to be expected as the W7 client without (RDP 8) can not use a RemoteFX v2 (good term you coined!) module.
1.2 The virtualisation host posts an entry in the Remote Desktop Services - RemoteFX - Manager log that the W7 client's session is using the CPU to compress graphics, regardless of image quality and screen capture rate set in the W8 VM's GP.
2. User Experience (UX) at a Windows 7 client vs UX at a Windows 8 client when connected to a W8EE VM
Regardless of:
(a) Whether RemoteFX 2008 R2 SP1 compatibility is set or not at the W8EE VM
(b) The image quality set at the VM for RemoteFX Adaptive Graphics (medium and lossless were tested)
....the user experience at a W7 client is better than the UX at a W8 client.
3. UX at a Windows 8 client
The UX with medium image quality for RemoteFX Adaptive Graphics is better than the UX with lossless image quality.
4. Best UX
The best UX is obtained using a Windows 7 (EE/Ultimate) VM and a Windows 7 client.
Regards,
Etienne
- Edited by thereallightseeker Monday, December 3, 2012 6:01 PM To improve readability
------------------------------------
Flame, Digital signature on file not trusted: 0x800B0001
Similar situation on Windows 7 Starter. Looking into the WindowsUpdate.log I can see
4fc Setup Determining whether a new setup handler needs to be downloaded
2012-06-18 20:10:43:006 960 4fc Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Handler\WuSetupV.exe:
2012-06-18 20:10:43:037 960 4fc Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-18 20:10:43:037 960 4fc Misc WARNING: Digital Signatures on file C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Handler\WuSetupV.exe are not trusted: Error 0x800b0001
2012-06-18 20:10:43:037 960 4fc Setup WARNING: Trust verification failed for WuSetupV.exe. It will be deleted and downloaded, error = 0x800B0001
2012-06-18 20:10:43:037 960 4fc Setup SelfUpdate handler update required: Current version: 7.6.7600.256, required version: 7.6.7600.256
2012-06-18 20:10:43:037 960 4fc Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-ActiveX~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256"
2012-06-18 20:10:43:068 960 4fc Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-ActiveX~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256" is already installed.
2012-06-18 20:10:43:068 960 4fc Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Aux-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256"
2012-06-18 20:10:43:240 960 4fc Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Aux-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256" is applicable but is already staged; it will not be downloaded.
2012-06-18 20:10:43:240 960 4fc Setup Evaluating applicability of setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Core-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256"
2012-06-18 20:10:43:723 960 4fc Setup Setup package "WUClient-SelfUpdate-Core-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~x86~~7.6.7600.256" is already installed.
2012-06-18 20:10:43:723 960 4fc Setup SelfUpdate check completed. SelfUpdate is NOT required.
2012-06-18 20:10:45:861 960 4fc Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
2012-06-18 20:10:45:907 960 4fc Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-18 20:10:45:907 960 4fc Misc WARNING: Digital Signatures on file C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab are not trusted: Error 0x800b0001
2012-06-18 20:10:46:048 960 4fc Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
2012-06-18 20:10:46:079 960 4fc Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-18 20:10:46:079 960 4fc PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing server updates +++++++++++
2012-06-18 20:10:46:079 960 4fc PT + ServiceId = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}, Server URL =https://www.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2012-06-18 20:13:07:433 960 4fc Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
2012-06-18 20:13:07:479 960 4fc Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-18 20:13:07:589 960 4fc Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D\muv4muredir.cab:
2012-06-18 20:13:07:620 960 4fc Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-18 20:13:07:635 960 4fc PT +++++++++++ PT: Synchronizing extended update info +++++++++++
2012-06-18 20:13:07:635 960 4fc PT + ServiceId = {7971F918-A847-4430-9279-4A52D1EFE18D}, Server URL =https://www.update.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc Misc WARNING: Send failed with hr = 80072ee2.
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc Misc WARNING: SendRequest failed with hr = 80072ee2. Proxy List used: <(null)> Bypass List used : <(null)> Auth Schemes used : <>
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT + Last proxy send request failed with hr = 0x80072EE2, HTTP status code = 0
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT + Caller provided credentials = No
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT + Impersonate flags = 0
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT + Possible authorization schemes used =
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT WARNING: GetExtendedUpdateInfo failure, error = 0x80072EE2, soap client error = 5, soap error code = 0, HTTP status code = 200
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT WARNING: PTError: 0x80072ee2
2012-06-18 20:14:07:071 960 4fc PT WARNING: GetExtendedUpdateInfo_WithRecovery: 0x80072ee2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:148 960 4fc PT WARNING: Sync of Extended Info: 0x80072ee2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:148 960 4fc PT WARNING: SyncServerUpdatesInternal failed : 0x80072ee2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:195 960 4fc Agent * WARNING: Exit code = 0x80072EE2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:195 960 4fc Agent *********
2012-06-18 20:14:08:195 960 4fc Agent ** END ** Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = AutomaticUpdates]
2012-06-18 20:14:08:195 960 4fc Agent *************
2012-06-18 20:14:08:195 960 4fc Agent WARNING: WU client failed Searching for update with error 0x80072ee2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:319 960 e00 AU >>## RESUMED ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {8A83B3B5-055F-497E-B452-92F64D934BC9}]
2012-06-18 20:14:08:319 960 e00 AU # WARNING: Search callback failed, result = 0x80072EE2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:319 960 e00 AU # WARNING: Failed to find updates with error code 80072EE2
2012-06-18 20:14:08:319 960 e00 AU #########
2012-06-18 20:14:08:319 960 e00 AU ## END ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {8A83B3B5-055F-497E-B452-92F64D934BC9}]Maybe this problem is a result of the exploit described at
http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002383.html
which, in part, states that
Flame creates a local proxy which it uses to intercept traffic to Microsoft Update. This is used to spread Flame to other machines in a local area network.
The fake update was signed with a certificate linking up to Microsoft root, as the attackers found a way to repurpose Microsoft Terminal Server license certificates. Even this wasn't enough to spoof newer Windows versions, so they did some cutting-edge cryptographic research and came up with a completely new way to create hash collisions, enabling them to spoof the certificate. They still needed a supercomputer though. And they've been doing this silently since 2010.
I believe that I may have been a political target of the Flame virus. I realize that Flame is a weapon of war designed by Western and Israeli intelligence to be used against the Islamic Republic of Iran and other enemies of the Rothschild banking empire. Yesterday morning I rebooted my Windows 7 PC to find a suspicious windows update being installed during the boot sequence despite the fact I disabled automatic updates. I immediately checked the WindowsUpdate.log to see what was installed, and I came across several suspicious warnings and errors that suggest I may have been infected by a variant of Flame or similar malware that spoofs the windows update feature. Others have been reporting similar problems in the last 2-3 weeks. This was found in my WindowsUpdate.log:
2012-06-25 21:04:29:829 812 510 Setup Determining whether a new setup handler needs to be downloaded
2012-06-25 21:04:29:836 812 510 Misc Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Handler\WuSetupV.exe:
2012-06-25 21:04:29:842 812 510 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-25 21:04:29:842 812 510 Misc WARNING: Digital Signatures on file C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Handler\WuSetupV.exe are not trusted: Error 0x800b0001
2012-06-25 21:04:29:842 812 510 Setup WARNING: Trust verification failed for WuSetupV.exe. It will be deleted and downloaded, error = 0x800B0001
2012-06-25 21:04:29:842 812 510 Setup SelfUpdate handler update required: Current version: 7.6.7600.256, required version: 7.6.7600.256
2012-06-25 21:04:30:741 812 510 Setup SelfUpdate check completed. SelfUpdate is required.
2012-06-25 21:04:30:741 812 510 Setup Downloading binaries required for SelfUpdate
2012-06-25 21:04:30:741 812 510 Setup Downloading SelfUpdate handler WuSetupHandler.cab from http://download.windowsupdate.com/v9/1/windowsupdate/b/selfupdate/WSUS3/x64/Vista
2012-06-25 21:04:30:752 812 510 Misc Validating signature for :\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\SelfUpdate\Handler\WuSetupHandler.cab:
2012-06-25 21:04:30:765 812 510 Misc Microsoft signed: Yes
2012-06-25 21:04:31:084 812 510 Setup Successfully downloaded SelfUpdate handler
2012-06-25 21:04:31:084 812 510 Setup Download of SelfUpdate binaries succeeded
2012-06-25 21:04:31:084 812 510 Setup Starting agent SelfUpdate
2012-06-25 21:04:31:084 812 510 Setup Skipping installation because no critical packages are ready to install.
On reboot Windows 7 installed the so called 'update.'
Here is my entire WindowsUpdate.log http://www.filedropper.com/windowsupdatelogtar
"The full mechanism isn't yet completely analyzed, but Flame has a module which appears to attempt to do a man-in-the-middle attack on the Microsoft Update or Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) system. If successful, the attack drops a file called WUSETUPV.EXE to the target computer. This file is signed by Microsoft with a certificate that is chained up to Microsoft root.
Except it isn't signed really by Microsoft."
Source: http://www.f-secure.com/weblog/archives/00002377.html
"We have confirmed that Flame uses a yet unknown MD5 chosen-prefix collision attack," Marc Stevens and B.M.M. de Weger wrote in an e-mail posted to a cryptography discussion group earlier this week. "The collision attack itself is very interesting from a scientific viewpoint, and there are already some practical implications."
Source: http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/06/flame-crypto-breakthrough/
"New research has shown that it can be run at a rate close to 1 million checks per second on COTS GPU hardware, which means that it is as prone to brute-force attacks as the DES based UNIX crypt was back in 1995: Any 8 character password can be found in a couple of days."
Source: http://phk.freebsd.dk/sagas/md5crypt_eol.html
While my computer was exhibiting symptoms of the Flame variant, my Gigabyte GV-R485-512H-B, ATI 4850 video card P/N: 113-B5012-105 (Bios Revision 011.004.000.000.029193) was overheating (flaming hot if you prefer) and the fan was out of control, speeding up and down... my computer crashed half a dozen times. I had to flash the bios to fix the problem. Can variants of Flame use the GPU of infected machines to crack encryption?
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Could US cyberspies have moles inside Microsoft? (Source)
By Stewart Mitchell
Posted on 15 Jun 2012 at 09:00
US government officials could be working under cover at Microsoft to help the country's cyber-espionage programme, according to one leading security expert.
The warning comes in the wake of the Flame virus that targeted key computers in the Middle East, and in part used confidential Microsoft certificates in order to access machines.
According to Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at security firm F-Secure, the claim is a logical conclusion to a series of recent discoveries and disclosures linking the US government to 2010's Stuxnet attack on Iran and ties between Stuxnet and the recent Flame attack.
"The announcement that links Flame to Stuxnet and the conclusive proof that Stuxnet was a US tool means that Flame is also linked to the US government," Hypponen said.
It's plausible that if there is an operation under way and being run by a US intelligence agency it would make perfect sense for them to plant moles inside Microsoft
"This makes you think that this breach of Microsoft's update system was done by the Americans and most likely a US agency, someone like the NSA," Hypponen said. "That must make Microsoft mad as hell that its most critical system, used by 900 million of its customers, was breached by fellow Americans."
Obama-FBI-Microsoft collusion: warrantless snooping on the Internet.
(Source)
At a gathering of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, Homeland Security's Janet Napolitano said,
The First Amendment protects radical opinions, but we need the legal tools to do things like monitor the recruitment of terrorists via the Internet."
The fact is both the administration and Microsoft are already betraying the public.
Back in 2008, Microsoft provided the U.S. government a technical "backdoor" to its browser, which serves the majority of users (over 60%). Backdoor access is undetectable by security software—it bypasses normal authentication (passwords, etc.), firewalls and other computer security devices. In other terms, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, the FBI and other security agencies can already eavesdrop on anyone using Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser.
In its infinite greed and fierce competitiveness, Microsoft opts for advertising dollars over providing customers easy access to privacy tools--a de facto, covert compromise of our constitutional rights. Although the computer giant has an effective tool ("InPrivate Filtering"), you have to know about it and then turn it on every time you start up the Explorer browser.
Essentially, Microsoft gives snoops, hackers, advertisers, usage trackers and terrorists the upper hand over oblivious users. In its usual self-serving interests, Microsoft claims the company tried to "synthesize" both points of view about privacy,
Microsoft installs Skype without consent (source)
Apparently by mistake, Microsoft's Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) last night deployed a Skype update to Windows clients that had never had the telephony and messaging software installed. This resulted in Skype being installed on these computers.
The issue affects all computers that automatically receive Microsoft's updates via WSUS without explicit administrator approval. After the blunder surfaced publicly, Microsoft marked the update as expired. It is now no longer being deployed by WSUS servers.
Updates via WSUS are becoming increasingly popular in networks where multiple Windows systems need updating. With a WSUS server, administrators can minimise network loads and control which updates will be installed. In this case, the Skype update was deployed as a non-security update.
The cyberweapon, jointly developed by the US and Israel, with the full knowledge and complicity of the Obama administration, uses the Microsoft Windows Update mechanism, and simulated signing by the Microsoft Corp. Root Certificate, to authenticate the spread of wiretapping software on the computers of any citizen unfortunate enough to be targeted. Flame is designed to record Skype conversations
This is, of course, a gross violation of the principle that US government agencies my not tap US citizens at random.
I'm sure Microsoft Corp. appreciates colluding with the governments of the United States and Israel, and of course President Obama, and implicated in Civil Rights and other violations of US constitutional guarantees against indiscriminate home invasion (not to mention quartering troops....)
- Edited by ravenise Friday, June 29, 2012 8:24 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Jewish Protection Racket, Flame: tip of the Iceburg, Cyber Espionage on the Rise
Now that the creators of Flame have disclosed their product in a blatant sales pitch to attract would be customers, Crowdstrike wants sell you their solution and save the whole world. Why is CrowdStrike software already obsolete and worthless? Why should you avoid their products like the plague? Because the security industry is a racket and all they are looking to do is Jew money for their extortion products... and I will tell you why.
When was the last time you reverse-engineered all the PCI devices on your motherboard? After all it would be trivial for Intel to build in a back-door into their processors. Even something as simple as: "if (rax == MAGIC_1 && rcx == MAGIC_2) jmp [rbx]". It's actually worse than you think. A CPU is too complex for a human to design on the physical level, so we have to rely on software to do the design. This software could be compromised without the knowledge of an honest engineer. Back-doors can be installed directly into hardware components allowing root access to everything on the victims machine. There is no software solution to these kind of back-doors. In an ever changing dynamic digital world there is no final solution except to rely upon pencil and paper for all of your transactions. In the age of quantum entanglement even that won't get you very far. Yes even those neurophone implants that direct electromagnetic audio signals into the brains of IDF commanders in order for them to communicate De-facto telepathically aren't gonna save ya either, although it may cure deaf shell shock victims in the aftermath. The only temporary solution is to only use hardware manufactured and programmed with trusted components or to implement hardware based redundancies which render all potential back-doors null and void. Seeing that Intel is an Israeli-Jewish based company, you should assume that there are hardwired back-doors in all civilian sector and non-domestic military products. Keeping in mind that once the Jews finally decide to activate these back-doors to send information over a network, then it is all over for them... only during a time of war would the full extent of the damage caused by dormant unknown back-door variables become fully known. The outcome of any global war in the 21'st century will be determined predominately by digital means and the degree in which so-called leaders care more or less about everybody except themselves.
Even if ones personal computer hardware is technically clean off the assembly line, with a basic understanding of programmable language, a hacker could conceivably install a back-door into any piece of hardware that contains an expansion ROM, or on-board ROM boot-chip. Malware could be conceived that locates flashable hardware, saves a copy of the BIOS or firmware, and patches or re-flashes them with malicious code hooks, giving nearly undetectable hardware level remote access to intruders. This articleexplains in detail how by using a PCI card expansion ROM, and using only 200 bytes of code one can patch the kernel module of any Linux-distro and have complete administrator control over the computer at the hardware level leaving absolutely no traces on the computer. One would require hardware level anti-malware systems to detect such a back-door.
Wireless keyboard and mice signal's are easily intercepted... (Source)
If you don't think that manufactures would be willing to go to such lengths, keep in mind thatmanufacturers in Taiwan were caught producing external drives with a Trojan virus pre-installed on them which transmitted any data saved on the drives to online servers. In 2006 Apple manufactured an IPod with a Trojan virus pre-installed. Chinese manufactures are well known to manufacture counterfeit chips that on behalf of the US military, wound up installed in critical US military equipment.
In April of 2012 RuggedCom, a Canadian based critical communications infrastructure manufacturer recently bought up by Siemens, in one of the most alarming revelations in the IT world, was discovered to have been manufacturing software with a hardwired back-door easily accessible to anybody with the elementary know-how.
"equipment running RuggedCom's Rugged Operating System has an undocumented account that can't be modified and a password that's trivial to crack. What's more, researchers say, for years the company hasn't bothered to warn the power utilities, military facilities, and municipal traffic departments using the industrial-strength gear that the account can give attackers the means to sabotage operations that affect the safety of huge populations of people."
"It is esoteric, it is obscure, but this equipment is everywhere," he said. "I was walking down the street and they had one of the traffic control cabinets that controls stop lights open and there was a RuggedCom switch, so while you and I may not see it, this is what's used in electric substations, in train control systems, in power plants and in the military. That's why I personally care about it so much."
"The US Navy, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, and Chevron are just three of the customers who rely on the gear, according to this page on RuggedCom's website."
"The backdoor uses the login ID of "factory" and a password that's recovered by plugging the MAC, or media access control, address of the targeted device into a simple Perl script, according to this post published on Monday to the Full Disclosure security list. To make unauthorized access easy, paying customers of the Shodan computer search engine can find the IP numbers of more than 60 networks that use the vulnerable equipment. The first thing users who telnet into them see, as the picture above demonstrates, is its MAC address." (Source)
-Ed Note, Just take a glimpse at that last link, search for a power plant, police station, or oil refinery and you will have an idea of just how vulnerable the world is thanks to corporations like Siemens.
"Programmable logic controllers like these are used to operate machinery used in refineries and other critical infrastructure. Despite their sensitivity, manufacturers often decline to fix software flaws that could allow the devices to be remotely hijacked."
Quote, "Other forever day vulnerabilities date back as far as six years. A plugin added to the Nessus security scanner in 2006, for example, targets an FTP server that ships with the Modicon Quantum, a programmable logic controller made by Schneider-Electric. More than six years later, the back-door accounts hard-coded into the device remain.
Another buggy PLC that won't be fixed anytime soon is the Siemens's SIMATIC controller used in plants in the water, wastewater, oil, gas, and chemical industries. According to an advisory issued in September, "Siemens currently has no plans to patch this vulnerability," which stemmed from an overflow that could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code on the targeted human-machine interface system.
Earlier this year, researchers discovered a series of additional vulnerabilities in the same product. Some of them, including default administrator passwords that are easy to recover, remain unfixed. Instead, "Siemens has changed the documentation to encourage users to change the password at first login." (source)
It should come as no surprise that Siemens colluded with the US and Israel to create the Stuxnet worm which was detected in Siemens controllers of Japanese power stations months before the disaster at Fukushima.
While the US military is searching for Chinese built kill-switches in their junkware in their quest to massacre another innocent nation that actually knows how to run a country, and are not subservient to aRothschild controlled private central bank...
"Are chip makers building electronic trapdoors in key military hardware? The Pentagon is making its biggest effort yet to find out."
(cont)...Intel's new Sandy Bridge & Ivy architecture is openly sold with a built in remote kill switch and drive wiper that could be flipped at the discretion of the Rothschild crime syndicate even if the computer has no Internet connection or isn't even turned on. The new lineup even has a convenient remote BIOS back-door sold as a 'feature.'
Everything can be reverse engineered and hacked eventually... how long will it be before someone other than "Israel" gets their hands on the code to kill the CPU's? Is there any hands out there that could be worse than these people? Perhaps openly selling products with back-doors is an attempt to avoid class action lawsuits against their company when they decide to proactively disengage anti-asshole dissidents while they continue their legacy of corporate espionage. If the general public doesn't hack the code first, the hook nosed black hats at Intel will certainly sell their secrets in due time, anything for a shekel.
The world public should file a class action lawsuit against Siemens and RuggedCom. The only way to prevent these problems is to hit the perpetrators where it hurts, in the pocket... even if it simply means walking away from their crapware. Israeli's don't like chess. It would appear that the ideal world of the Zionist banker is to have the all of humanity running everything from one centralized monolithic power grid... a kind of high stakes game of Ganga where the only direction to go is up, and if you remove even the most redundant part, the entire system comes crashing down. Israel likes to call it the Sampson option. All the safety mechanisms that could create a worthwhile product have been thrown out the window. Anybody who believes in good faith that Microsoft, Intel, and Crowdstrike, or any of these security racketeers will protect you are wasting their breath and flirting with the loss of everything they seek to protect. Its a two tiered system, one for the Jew, one for the Goy. Israel is actively seeking to ensure that every weapons targeting system in the world has an un-hackableIFF (Identification Friend or Foe) no-friendly-fire system implemented to protect the Jewish state, even if it means self-destruction of the unit. Can Israel be certain that their own Submarines, Aircraft, Missiles and Tanks are not riddled with ticking time-bombs and back-doors? I am betting on the unexpected. 
While the evidence of what happened in the Gulf bubbles up from the bottom of the deep blue sea, and the evidence of what happened in Fukushima lies bleeding into the pacific, we can assume that any suspicious occurrence ranging from hardware malfunctions of stop lights at highway intersections, to aircraft crashes, to car accidents, to hardware failures, to monolithic industrial disasters like Fukushima and the Gulf oil spill are the result of greed driven corporate espionage caused by time-bombs and back-doors built into hardware components. Planned obsolescence may be a better term in many instances... anything so the "donkey's" continue coming back for a shekel, as Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in Israel would say. "Better buy our crapware or somethin bad gonna happen to ya."
In 2007, when the Israeli air force invaded Syria and destroyed the al-Kibar site, Israel alleged that the site was harboring a nuclear reactor... however, subsequent inspections by the IAEA proved once again that every accusation coming from the usurping Jewish entity is a fabricated lie. Some reports suggest that Syrian air radars malfunctioned during this period because of? You guessed it, a built in back-door within the CPU's used to power them. Meanwhile the IDF unit involved with the development of Fuku-Stuxnetis pushing forward both offensive and defensive cyber warfare exercises, "establishing offensive capabilities and operations within Military Intelligence's Unit 8200 and defensive operations in the C4I Directorate's Cyber Defenders Division."
And this brings me onto the next bit. I believe that I may have been a political target of a variant of the Flame malware... more on my experience here. I am beginning to suspect that Flame is downloaded directly from Microsoft's servers onto target specific machines as the Jewish money power increases their cyber espionage activities against civilized nations and activists around the globe.
Quote, "US government officials could be working under cover at Microsoft to help the country's cyber-espionage programme, according to one leading security expert. The warning comes in the wake of the Flame virus that targeted key computers in the Middle East, and in part used confidential Microsoft certificates in order to access machines. According to Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer at security firm F-Secure, the claim is a logical conclusion to a series of recent discoveries and disclosures linking the US government to 2010's Stuxnet attack on Iran and ties between Stuxnet and the recent Flame attack."
"The announcement that links Flame to Stuxnet and the conclusive proof that Stuxnet was a US tool means that Flame is also linked to the US government," Hypponen said.
It's plausible that if there is an operation under way and being run by a US intelligence agency it would make perfect sense for them to plant moles inside Microsoft "This makes you think that this breach of Microsoft's update system was done by the Americans and most likely a US agency, someone like the NSA," Hypponen said.
"That must make Microsoft mad as hell that its most critical system, used by 900 million of its customers, was breached by fellow Americans." End Quote.
Keep in mind that that F-Secure and other security companies claim to have had samples of Flame for years, but have done absolutely nothing about it, "Mikko Hypponen, the well-regarded chief research officer at Finland's F-Secure Oyj, told the Reuters Summit his company had a sample of Flame in 2010 and classified it as clean" Source
Flame was detected in Hungary, Russia, and Iran only a month ago. This suggests that major security firms were working in collusion with the US and Israeli governments to remain silent about these weapons of mass destruction. Stuxnet was detected in the Siemens controllers of nuclear power plants in Japan just prior to the Fukushima disaster in which the emergency cooling systems of the Fukushima rectors failed to activate properly. In fact, an Israeli firm was in charge of security at the Fukushima plant during the time of the disaster. Iran and Japan should launch a joint investigation into this matter to see if the Jewish security firm and software created by these rogue intelligence agencies were the root cause for the greatest nuclear disaster in human history. Latest reports indicate that Cesium 137 has been detected in some ~95% of the urine samples of individuals living within 200 kilometers from the Fukushima disaster area.
In 2011 Microsoft handed contracts to Israeli based firms to provide low level networking components in Windows 8. Talk about your chutzpah:
Israel's Mellanox to Drive Windows Server 8, providing InfiniBand and Ethernet components to drive core Windows Server 8 functionality. Source
Microsoft has been colluding with the FBI and other intelligence agencies for years now.
Quote, "Back in 2008, Microsoft provided the U.S. government a technical "backdoor" to its browser, which serves the majority of users (over 60%). Backdoor access is undetectable by security software—it bypasses normal authentication (passwords, etc.), firewalls and other computer security devices. In other terms, the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, the FBI and other security agencies can already eavesdrop on anyone using Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser."(Source)
One module of Flame reportedly records and stores Skype conversations on victims computers and uploads the content to 'command and control' servers on the Internet. Just days ago, Microsoft's windows update service installed Skype onto unsuspecting victims computers without their consent. Microsoft MVP Lawrence Garvin confirmed yesterday that when leaving automatic updates enabled on your windows machine that quote "You have no control over what is installed -- right or wrong." If in fact Flame was a collaborative effort involving rouge elements within Microsoft as suspected, then we should expect that flame could very well be installed onto target specific machines directly from Microsoft's own servers. One source recently suggested that "the creators of these viruses have apparently managed to plant them on any PC they wanted to." How do they know?
"We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
—Jewish International Banker James Warburg on February 17, 1950, as he testified before the U.S. Senate. James was the son of Paul Warburg, who represented the Rothschilds when they created the Federal Reserve act at Jekyll Island in 1910. He also later formed the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Remember him the next time you wonder why the dollar is so worthless.
CrowdStrike appears to be a Jewish financed gang of security veterans with direct ties to the Warburg crime family, J.P Morgan and other major criminal financial firms working in collusion with elements within US Government, FBI, CIA, Private, and Israeli Military Intelligence Unit 8200 and defensive operations in the C4I Directorate's Cyber Defenders Division, Microsoft, Mcafee, Google...etc.
Elements of the CrowdStrike team oversaw cyber espionage directed against China in recent years. Remember the debacle about Googles hacking allegations against China? Operation Aurora, Night Dragon, and Shady RAT in which these Jewish criminals constantly cried out in pain when they strike their victims? Keep in mind that Joogle itself is a tribe enterprise, read: The Jewish hand behind Internet - Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, Yahoo!, MySpace, eBay.
Quote "Operation Aurora was a cyber attack which began in mid-2009 and continued through December 2009. The attack was first publicly disclosed by Google on January 12, 2010, in a blog post. In the blog post, Google said the attack originated in China. The attacks were both sophisticated and well resourced and consistent with an advanced persistent threat attack." snip "As a result of the attack, Google stated in its blog that it plans to operate a completely uncensored version of its search engine in China "within the law, if at all", and acknowledged that if this is not possible it may leave China and close its Chinese offices. Official Chinese media responded stating that the incident is part of a U.S. government conspiracy." Source
Of course, citing a link directly from CrowdStrike's website "Google would like you to think of them as the dolphin in a vendor sea full of sharks. snip -But what they won't do is hold your hand when you're drowning in technical issues."
Maimonides, Mishnah Torah, (Moznaim Publishing Corporation, Brooklyn, New York, 1990, Chapter 10, English Translation), p. 184: "Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him. If we see that his life is in danger, we should not save him." The Hebrew text of the Feldheim 1981 edition of Mishnah Torah states this as well.
They create the problem, blame the victim, and claim to offer a viable solution, for a shekel of course... Co-Founder & CTO of CrowdStrike, Dmitri Alperovitch claims that "Some victims (China in particular) seem determined to deny they've been attacked, even when offered empirical proof that a smash-and-grab has taken place." ed note: Who could have proof of these so called smash and grab's but the people behind the them in the first place? China wont let these clowns near them.
"Don't worry, there is a ray of hope, CrowdStrike vows to Save the World From Flame Malware" Source
All these Talmud thumpers seem to be useful for is creating more and more problems. When there is a serious issue that needs attention, they don't care... they project their incompetence on to people who actually know how to run a nation properly. This diseased mindset relies souly upon the acquisition of temporary profits at the expense of others and anything of any real lasting value. Human civilization as we have known it could be living in a kind of garden of eden at this time, yet it is teetering on the brink because most people's primary concern seems to be creaming every last bit of pretty printed imaginary profits from a dieing empire. The people behind these crimes must be stopped and brought to justice before they take the civilized world down with them.
If you want security, I recommend checking out China's new Loongson CPU product line... hopefully Iran will start printing out their own CPU's for the general public as well.
- Edited by ravenise Tuesday, July 3, 2012 5:51 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
This issue / error can be cause by the wintrust.dll needing to be registered.
Open cmd as an administrator and run regsvr32 Wintrust.dll /s
------------------------------------
Reply:
This link worked for me !!!!
That worked really fantastic !!
Follow it "As- Is"
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserverwsus/thread/a47039d9-4d45-4a61-aa26-6100aeffc1f0
------------------------------------
Authentication for Web application
Hi All,
I want to a create web application in sharepoint 2013. I am very new to Sharepoint.
I am bit confused in Authentication type. Either am I need to use claims authentication or forms authentication.
Anybody help me please.
My requirements are
We have one site in SP2010.
- We have nearly 1200 users in AD. Only AD users will use this Website. And they can access this site anywhere from the world.
- If any user forget their password we will reset in AD. That will Effect the SP2010 site logon.
- windows logon(if they are working in the company, their laptop/desktop password also change regardingly)
- Wise versa ,I mean if they changed their password in the website , that will change in AD,Windows Logon aswell.
For this happening we have logon page with the option I want to change my password after logged on. If clicked on this will take to the password change page their they can enter old,new password and hit change password button.
To obtain all of these am I need to use claims authentication.
And is it possible to avoid users who ever logged in domain network , skip the logon page. Only if they are outside of the company need to enter credentials to the website.
How to Achieve this . And For Custom Logon pages any ideas please.
Anybody help me please.
Thank you Very much.
Reply:
I completely understand your situation, With the help of SharePoint, all the above mentioned scenarios are easily possible without much effort.
To answer your question…… Yes, You can configure claims Authentication
I have provide my suggestions inline below,
We have nearly 1200 users in AD. Only AD users will use this Website. And they can access this site anywhere from the world.
Yes, You need to configure User Profile Service. Where in user profiles form AD will be synchronized in SharePoint, For more information check the links
This is a video I found explaining user profile synchronization: It's way too high level though: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/technet/en-us/office/media/video/video.html?cid=stc&from=mscomoffice&VideoID=29d6d43b-3a9a-4e1c-97e4-3fa93ac0d810
This is the official "Configuring profile synchronization guide" from TechNet: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee721049(office.14).aspx#WebAppProc
This TechNet article had some info related to planning user profiles: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee721054.aspx
If any user forget their password we will reset in AD. That will Effect the SP2010 site logon.
User profile synchronization service will take of this once configured.
windows logon(if they are working in the company, their laptop/desktop password also change regardingly)
User profile synchronization service will take of this once configured.
Wise versa ,I mean if they changed their password in the website , that will change in AD,Windows Logon aswell.
The common practice if change password will be done through desktop.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Thanks Alot ParthaStarSP, Much Appreciated your quick and valuable response.
This is very helpful for me. And i have one more thing
In claims authentication i need to use integrated windows authentication option only. no need to use forms suthentication. Am i right.
2. I want to use custom login page and logout page for the site. Like
Company logo Company name
I want to change my password after looged on
username -
password -
logon some thing like this. - could you tell me , how to do this please
3. Is it possible to configure like if the users are login to the site inside the domain network no need to enter credentials . Only if they login outside of the domain network need to enter credentails.
If possible please, give me some guidence how to achieve this .
thank you Very much.
------------------------------------
Reply:
Hi Raja,
If you want to create a custom login page for Windows Authentication in SharePoint 2010, then you made needs to enable forms authentication and the membership provider would be AD.
Please check
Changing/customize the Login page
http://tomaszrabinski.pl/
------------------------------------
Internet Explorer locks up for several minutes
I have three new computers in our company that are all having the same problem with MSIE 9. The computers are two Dell Optiplex 7010 systems and one Dell Latitude E6530 Laptop. All three systems have Windows 7 64 bit and MS Office 2010 32 bit (the 32 bit Office was the recommended version by Microsoft). Other software is also installed but the only thing the three have in common is the OS and Office versions. MSIE 9 worked just fine for the first day or so and then it began freezing up for 6 to 7 minutes any time the user went to a web site that had any form of content on it such as MSN or Bank or America and numerous other websites that we use for business. It is so bad that it has rendered MSIE 9 completely useless on all three computers. This is an issue because there are business web site that we use that only support MSIE. I have installed Firefox and Google Chrome on these computers as a work around until we can find the cause of the issue with MSIE.
I have read through all of the threads I can find on this subject and I have tried all of the recommended solutions but we still have the problem. One suggestion was going to Tools\Internet Options\Advanced Tab and doing a reset. I tried that and it did not help. Another suggestion was to go to Start\All Programs\Accessories\System Tools\start MSIE without add ons. When I start MSIE in that mode it seems to work much better so that tells me it has something to do with addons. However at this point we have all add-ons disabled using Manage Add-ons and it still locks up unless it is started without add-ons. My guess is that there is a Office 2010 add-on of some sort that is causing the issue and it also seems to be related to the users profile as MSIE seems to work fine under the administrator account. I am assuming that is because I have never started up and component of MS Office 2010 while logged in under the administrator account.
Can anyone help us figure this problem out because it is a serious issue that is preventing us from properly accessing certain business related web sites.
- Edited by JeanD Friday, November 30, 2012 8:06 PM
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
Optimize ie9,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936213/no
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/internet-explorer/slow-five-tips-to-boost-performance
This is quick and should be done first,
http://support.microsoft.com/mats/ie_performance_and_safety/
Can't access secure sites,
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967897
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Why-cant-I-view-some-websites
http://support.microsoft.com/mats/ie_freezes_or_crashes/en-us
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/tips-for-solving-problems-with-internet-explorer
- Edited by ThrashZone Friday, November 30, 2012 5:46 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Optimize ie9,<o:p></o:p>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/936213/no
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/internet-explorer/slow-five-tips-to-boost-performance<o:p></o:p>This is quick and should be done first,<o:p></o:p>
http://support.microsoft.com/mats/ie_performance_and_safety/<o:p></o:p>
Can't access secure sites,<o:p></o:p>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/967897<o:p></o:p>
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Why-cant-I-view-some-websites<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
http://support.microsoft.com/mats/ie_freezes_or_crashes/en-us<o:p></o:p>
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/tips-for-solving-problems-with-internet-explorer<o:p></o:p>
Thank you for the response but I have tried all of the above with no resolution to the problem. Some of those call for using the microsoft Fixit. With this problem I can't even run that. I have even tried downloading it with Firefox and then running it but it still doesn't help with the issue. As I stated I have disabled all add-ons and that does not solve the problem. MSIE 9 is what we are using in this case not 7 or 8. I still can't understand why MSIE will work if I start it without add-on but it won't work if I start it normally even though all of the add-ons are disabled.
------------------------------------
Reply:
I have previously tried all the above solutions as well, with no change in behavior. I have continued to do a little more troubleshooting over here on my end as well. I removed Office 2010 from one of the effected machines and installed office 2013, but the problem persists. I have also confirmed that the problem occurs in both IE 8 and IE 9.
I think Jean is right on with his question...What is the difference between disabling all add-ons and running IE with add-ons disabled.
------------------------------------
Reply:
I have previously tried all the above solutions as well, with no change in behavior. I have continued to do a little more troubleshooting over here on my end as well. I removed Office 2010 from one of the effected machines and installed office 2013, but the problem persists. I have also confirmed that the problem occurs in both IE 8 and IE 9.
I think Jean is right on with his question...What is the difference between disabling all add-ons and running IE with add-ons disabled.
On one of mt affected systems we originally had MS Office 2007 installed and we did not have any trouble with Internet Explorer then. The problems with Internet Explorer began when I removed Office 2007 and installed Office 2010. the other two system were setup with Office 2010 from the start. For what it's worth our Office suits are not OEM, they are bought through open licensing and installed by me. I tend to do complete installs otherwise I end up having to come back and install things that people want but are not part of a typical install.
------------------------------------
Reply:
freezing up for 6 to 7 minutes any time the user went to a web site that had any form of content on it such as MSN or Bank or America and numerous other websites that we sue for business.
Try using Developer Tools, Network Capture to see what is going on. Other BoA users notice that when you try to use HTTPS with (an unknown) one of its servers it just Aborts. So, if something like that was happening in an IFrame it could explain your symptom. E.g. the 6 to 7 minutes could be your client's ReceiveTimeout setting. If it is happening intermittently it could mean that they have one or a few bad servers out there.
we have all add-ons disabled using Manage Add-ons and it still locks up unless it is started without add-ons.
One approach might be to find out what is loaded in each case. You can do that with Resource Monitor or ProcExp. Even better IMO, would be tracing both cases with ProcMon and comparing the traces for their essential differences. It would probably be sufficient to start examining them using just the Process and Network event class filters.
HTH
Robert Aldwinckle
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
------------------------------------
Reply:
We have been running Office 2010 for years on these same servers without an issue. My best guess is that the issue is tied to one of the updates that was recently installed. I have tried uninstalling all the updates, but it did not help. It doesnt seem to matter which site I access, they all lock up (http & https).
------------------------------------
Reply:
Possible solution:
I found out that the difference between 'start without add-ons' and individually disabling them all was that 'start without add-ons' was also disabling the information bar from prompting for ActiveX downloads. I then put two and two together and headed over to update my flash player. After getting the latest update, my issue seems to be resolved. Hopefully this well fix your as well.
------------------------------------
Reply:
I don't have any of the developer tools
Actually you do. F12 in IE and link at the bottom of Performance tab in Task Manager (Ctrl-Shift-Esc).
------------------------------------
Reply:
See if this helps,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg130952(v=vs.85).aspx
I don't see what Office of any year version would effect internet explorer ?
Clean boot,<o:p></o:p>
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929135<o:p></o:p>
- Edited by ThrashZone Saturday, December 1, 2012 12:27 AM
------------------------------------
Reply:
I don't see what Office of any year version would effect internet explorer ?
@ dissed
Coincidentally today I think I might have. I have been trying to understand why XML is so messed up and noticed that I have this:
D:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\microsoft shared\OFFICE11\MSXML5.DLL
and I have other msxml?.dll which are not mentioned by Manage Add-ons.
Here's where a "penny dropped"...
Robert
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
I'm not even going to pretend to understand,
I have office 2007 small business win-7 fresh install about 1 1/2 months ago,
------------------------------------
Reply:
I'm not even going to pretend to understand,
[image of Manage Add-ons screen with some XML related progids showing]
So that shows that you have software which has been using XML DOM Document 6.0. and Free Threaded XML DOM (something). My point was that until I used that script fragment in the Developer Tools Console tab my Manage Add-ons was oblivious of that one (and is still oblivious of the second because I didn't try to do anything with it.) The real test will come when I close IE and see if my Manage Add-ons lists go back to the way that they were. If so, it will show that testing in No Add-ons mode means that yes, by using no add-ons you have avoided your problem symptom but no, it does not mean that you can avoid your problem symptom merely by disabling all the add-ons that you see in the Manage Add-ons tool. E.g. if there are ActiveX objects out there which don't have to be shown as Enabled then your web pages may be using them without you being aware of them.
Robert
---
------------------------------------
Reply:
I obviously do not have the experience that some of you do with debugging software. Can someone tell me in easy to understand terms how I can go about fixing this issue?
I manage our IT infrastructure and that's not even my primary function at our company. I am by no means a software expert. I'm surprised that Microsoft is not aware of this issue.
- Edited by JeanD Monday, December 3, 2012 1:43 PM
------------------------------------
Reply:
Possible solution:
I found out that the difference between 'start without add-ons' and individually disabling them all was that 'start without add-ons' was also disabling the information bar from prompting for ActiveX downloads. I then put two and two together and headed over to update my flash player. After getting the latest update, my issue seems to be resolved. Hopefully this well fix your as well.
I did try updating the flash player and unfortunately for me that did not help.
------------------------------------
Capicom
- Moved by litdev Monday, December 3, 2012 2:29 PM (From:Small Basic)
Reply:
Jan [ WhTurner ] The Netherlands
------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment